Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti: real performance and FPS — which is better? Full comparison
Detailed gaming performance comparison
Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400
We compare the Intel Arc A310 and the GTX 750 Ti with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.
The Intel Arc A310 is ~38% faster than the GTX 750 Ti on average at 1080p. On top of that, the Intel Arc A310 is 34% cheaper (launch price).
Intel Arc A310
- Index (1080p)
- 10/100
- VRAM
- 4 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $99 · ≈ €91
- $/FPS (value)
- $9.00 · ≈ €8.28
- Upscaling
- XeSS
GTX 750 Ti
- Index (1080p)
- 8/100
- VRAM
- 2 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $149 · ≈ €137
- $/FPS (value)
- $18.63 · ≈ €17.14
- Upscaling
- FSR
Average FPS by resolution
Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.
| Resolution | Intel Arc A310 | GTX 750 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 11 | 8 | +38% |
| 1440p | 6 | 5 | +20% |
| 4K | 5 | 5 | = |
Which one for your resolution?
Intel Arc A310 (+38%)
Intel Arc A310 (+20%)
Tie
Specifications
Side-by-side specs of the Intel Arc A310 and GTX 750 Ti: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.
| Spec | Intel Arc A310 | GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Intel | NVIDIA |
| VRAM | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| TDP | 30W | 60W |
| Tier | Entry-level | Entry-level |
| Score 1080p | 10 | 8 |
| Score 1440p | 6 | 5 |
| Score 4K | 2 | 2 |
| Price (MSRP) | $99 | $149 |
| Architecture | Alchemist | Maxwell |
| Process Node | TSMC 6nm | TSMC 28nm |
| Shading Units (CUDA/Stream) | 768 | 640 |
| RT Cores | 6 | — |
| Texture Units (TMUs) | 32 | 40 |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| Base Clock | 1750 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| FP32 Performance (Teraflops) | 3.07 TFLOPS | 1.39 TFLOPS |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Clock | 15500 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 64-bit | 128-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | 86.4 GB/s |
| PCIe Version | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Transistor Count | 7.2B | 1.9B |
| Release Date | 2022-10-12 | 2014-02-18 |
Power & efficiency
TDP doesn't tell the whole story: here's how much each GPU delivers per watt it draws.
Intel Arc A310
- TDP
- 30W
- FPS/W
- 0.37
GTX 750 Ti
- TDP
- 60W
- FPS/W
- 0.13
The Intel Arc A310 is more efficient: it draws 30W less and delivers more per watt, though the Intel Arc A310 is still the faster card overall.
What FPS do these GPUs get in your game?
Pick the GPU and the game, and we'll take you straight to its real FPS.
Pick the GPU
Gaming Performance
Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.
| Game | Intel Arc A310 | GTX 750 Ti | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 12 | 9 | Intel Arc A310 |
 | 11 | 9 | Intel Arc A310 |
 | 9 | 7 | Intel Arc A310 |
 | 9 | 7 | Intel Arc A310 |
 | 9 | 8 | Intel Arc A310 |
| 9 | 7 | Intel Arc A310 | |
 | 11 | 9 | Intel Arc A310 |
 | 12 | 9 | Intel Arc A310 |
 | 13 | 10 | Intel Arc A310 |
 | 10 | 8 | Intel Arc A310 |
Verdict
Intel Arc A310 wins in 10 out of 10 games
At CheckFPS we measured both cards across 10 popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K on a reference CPU. The Intel Arc A310 comes out ahead by around 38% more FPS on average, and that lead holds up as resolution climbs. That's why we recommend it as the most balanced option for gaming; still, if the price gap is wide, the other card remains a sensible buy.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions when comparing the Intel Arc A310 with the GTX 750 Ti.
Which is better, the Intel Arc A310 or the GTX 750 Ti?
On average at 1080p, the Intel Arc A310 is 38% faster than the GTX 750 Ti. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.
Which is better at 4K?
At 4K Ultra, the Intel Arc A310 averages 5 FPS and the GTX 750 Ti 5 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.
Is it worth paying more for the faster one?
At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.
Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?
AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.
How big is the FPS difference between them?
On average across top games, the gap is around 38% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.
Intel Arc A310 vs 750 Ti: what's the real difference?
In performance, the Intel Arc A310 beats the GTX 750 Ti by around 38% more FPS on average at 1080p — the gap shifts a bit by resolution, as shown in the table above. If you're torn between the Intel Arc A310 and the 750 Ti on price, the price and $/FPS section above can help you decide.
