Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
Detailed gaming performance comparison
Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400
We compare the Intel Arc A310 and the GTX 1630 with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.
The Intel Arc A310 and the GTX 1630 perform almost identically; price and features make the difference.
Intel Arc A310
- Index (1080p)
- 10/100
- VRAM
- 4 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $99 · ≈ €91
- Upscaling
- XeSS
GTX 1630
- Index (1080p)
- 10/100
- VRAM
- 4 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $150 · ≈ €138
- Upscaling
- FSR
Average FPS by resolution
Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.
| Resolution | Intel Arc A310 | GTX 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 11 | 11 | = |
| 1440p | 6 | 6 | = |
| 4K | 5 | 5 | = |
Specifications
Side-by-side specs of the Intel Arc A310 and GTX 1630: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.
| Spec | Intel Arc A310 | GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Intel | NVIDIA |
| VRAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| TDP | 30W | 75W |
| Tier | Entry-level | Entry-level |
| Score 1080p | 10 | 10 |
| Score 1440p | 6 | 6 |
| Score 4K | 2 | 2 |
| Price (MSRP) | $99 | $150 |
Gaming Performance
Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.
| Game | Intel Arc A310 | GTX 1630 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grand Theft Auto IV: Complete Edition | 12FPS | 12FPS | Tie |
| Grand Theft Auto VI | 9FPS | 9FPS | Tie |
| Marvel 1943: Rise of Hydra | 11FPS | 11FPS | Tie |
| Marathon | 11FPS | 11FPS | Tie |
| Gears of War: E-Day | 10FPS | 10FPS | Tie |
| Onimusha: Way of the Sword | 12FPS | 12FPS | Tie |
| Phantom Blade Zero | 11FPS | 11FPS | Tie |
| 007 First Light | 11FPS | 11FPS | Tie |
| The Blood of Dawnwalker | 10FPS | 10FPS | Tie |
| Pathologic 3 | 14FPS | 14FPS | Tie |
Verdict
It's a tie: both GPUs win in 0 out of 10 games
Both GPUs offer very similar performance. Choose based on price and availability.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions when comparing the Intel Arc A310 with the GTX 1630.
Which is better, the Intel Arc A310 or the GTX 1630?
On average at 1080p, the Intel Arc A310 is 0% faster than the GTX 1630. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.
Which is better at 4K?
At 4K Ultra, the Intel Arc A310 averages 5 FPS and the GTX 1630 5 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.
Is it worth paying more for the faster one?
At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.
Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?
AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.
How big is the FPS difference between them?
On average across top games, the gap is around 0% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.