CheckFPS
HomeFPS CalculatorGPUsCompare GPUsOptimize FPS

Intel Arc A310 vs AMD Radeon RX 560

Detailed gaming performance comparison

Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400

We compare the Intel Arc A310 and the RX 560 with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.

The RX 560 is ~9% faster than the Intel Arc A310 on average at 1080p.

Intel Arc A310

Index (1080p)
10/100
VRAM
4 GB
Price (MSRP)
$99 · ≈ €91
Upscaling
XeSS

RX 560

Index (1080p)
11/100
VRAM
4 GB
Price (MSRP)
$99 · ≈ €91
Upscaling
FSR

Average FPS by resolution

Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.

ResolutionIntel Arc A310RX 560Difference
1080p1112+9%
1440p67+17%
4K55=

Specifications

Side-by-side specs of the Intel Arc A310 and RX 560: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.

SpecIntel Arc A310RX 560
BrandIntelAMD
VRAM4 GB4 GB
TDP30W80W
TierEntry-levelEntry-level
Score 1080p1011
Score 1440p67
Score 4K23
Price (MSRP)$99$99

Gaming Performance

Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.

GameIntel Arc A310RX 560Winner
Grand Theft Auto IV: Complete Edition12FPS13FPSRX 560
Grand Theft Auto VI9FPS10FPSRX 560
Marvel 1943: Rise of Hydra11FPS12FPSRX 560
Marathon11FPS12FPSRX 560
Gears of War: E-Day10FPS11FPSRX 560
Onimusha: Way of the Sword12FPS13FPSRX 560
Phantom Blade Zero11FPS12FPSRX 560
007 First Light11FPS12FPSRX 560
The Blood of Dawnwalker10FPS11FPSRX 560
Pathologic 314FPS15FPSRX 560

Verdict

AMD Radeon RX 560 wins in 10 out of 10 games

We recommend AMD Radeon RX 560 as the best option for gaming.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions when comparing the Intel Arc A310 with the RX 560.

Which is better, the Intel Arc A310 or the RX 560?

On average at 1080p, the RX 560 is 9% faster than the Intel Arc A310. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.

Which is better at 4K?

At 4K Ultra, the Intel Arc A310 averages 5 FPS and the RX 560 5 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.

Is it worth paying more for the faster one?

At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.

Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?

AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.

How big is the FPS difference between them?

On average across top games, the gap is around 9% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.

Related Comparisons

Intel Arc A310 vs GTX 950Intel Arc A310 vs GTX 1630Intel Arc A310 vs GTX 960RX 560 vs GTX 1050RX 560 vs R9 380RX 560 vs GTX 750 Ti

CheckFPS

CheckFPS was created by Lluis Enric Mayans, a PC hardware and graphics performance specialist. 200+ games, 135 GPUs, and real benchmark data to help you make better decisions.

200+ games · 135+ GPUs · 141+ CPUs

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Cookie Policy

Useful Links

  • Contact
  • About Us

Data sources & methodology

  • How we calculate FPS
🇪🇸Español🇬🇧English🇧🇷Português

© 2026 CheckFPS. All rights reserved.