CheckFPS
HomeFPS CalculatorGPUsCompare GPUsOptimize FPS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs Intel Arc A310

Detailed gaming performance comparison

Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400

We compare the GTX 1050 and the Intel Arc A310 with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.

The GTX 1050 is ~18% faster than the Intel Arc A310 on average at 1080p. On top of that, the Intel Arc A310 is 9% cheaper (launch price).

GTX 1050

Index (1080p)
12/100
VRAM
2 GB
Price (MSRP)
$109 · ≈ €100
Upscaling
FSR

Intel Arc A310

Index (1080p)
10/100
VRAM
4 GB
Price (MSRP)
$99 · ≈ €91
Upscaling
XeSS

Average FPS by resolution

Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.

ResolutionGTX 1050Intel Arc A310Difference
1080p1311+18%
1440p86+33%
4K55=

Specifications

Side-by-side specs of the GTX 1050 and Intel Arc A310: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.

SpecGTX 1050Intel Arc A310
BrandNVIDIAIntel
VRAM2 GB4 GB
TDP75W30W
TierEntry-levelEntry-level
Score 1080p1210
Score 1440p86
Score 4K32
Price (MSRP)$109$99

Gaming Performance

Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.

GameGTX 1050Intel Arc A310Winner
Grand Theft Auto IV: Complete Edition14FPS12FPSGTX 1050
Grand Theft Auto VI11FPS9FPSGTX 1050
Marvel 1943: Rise of Hydra13FPS11FPSGTX 1050
Marathon13FPS11FPSGTX 1050
Gears of War: E-Day12FPS10FPSGTX 1050
Onimusha: Way of the Sword15FPS12FPSGTX 1050
Phantom Blade Zero13FPS11FPSGTX 1050
007 First Light13FPS11FPSGTX 1050
The Blood of Dawnwalker12FPS10FPSGTX 1050
Pathologic 317FPS14FPSGTX 1050

Verdict

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 wins in 10 out of 10 games

We recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 as the best option for gaming.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions when comparing the GTX 1050 with the Intel Arc A310.

Which is better, the GTX 1050 or the Intel Arc A310?

On average at 1080p, the GTX 1050 is 18% faster than the Intel Arc A310. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.

Which is better at 4K?

At 4K Ultra, the GTX 1050 averages 5 FPS and the Intel Arc A310 5 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.

Is it worth paying more for the faster one?

At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.

Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?

AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.

How big is the FPS difference between them?

On average across top games, the gap is around 18% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.

Related Comparisons

GTX 1050 vs RX 560GTX 1050 vs GTX 960GTX 1050 vs GTX 950Intel Arc A310 vs GTX 1630Intel Arc A310 vs R9 380Intel Arc A310 vs Intel Arc A380

CheckFPS

CheckFPS was created by Lluis Enric Mayans, a PC hardware and graphics performance specialist. 200+ games, 135 GPUs, and real benchmark data to help you make better decisions.

200+ games · 135+ GPUs · 141+ CPUs

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Cookie Policy

Useful Links

  • Contact
  • About Us

Data sources & methodology

  • How we calculate FPS
🇪🇸Español🇬🇧English🇧🇷Português

© 2026 CheckFPS. All rights reserved.