CheckFPS
HomeFPS CalculatorGPUsCompare GPUsOptimize FPS

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

Detailed gaming performance comparison

Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400

We compare the Intel Arc A310 and the GTX 1050 with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.

The GTX 1050 is ~18% faster than the Intel Arc A310 on average at 1080p. On top of that, the Intel Arc A310 is 9% cheaper (launch price).

Intel Arc A310

Index (1080p)
10/100
VRAM
4 GB
Price (MSRP)
$99 · ≈ €91
Upscaling
XeSS

GTX 1050

Index (1080p)
12/100
VRAM
2 GB
Price (MSRP)
$109 · ≈ €100
Upscaling
FSR

Average FPS by resolution

Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.

ResolutionIntel Arc A310GTX 1050Difference
1080p1113+18%
1440p68+33%
4K55=

Specifications

Side-by-side specs of the Intel Arc A310 and GTX 1050: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.

SpecIntel Arc A310GTX 1050
BrandIntelNVIDIA
VRAM4 GB2 GB
TDP30W75W
TierEntry-levelEntry-level
Score 1080p1012
Score 1440p68
Score 4K23
Price (MSRP)$99$109

Gaming Performance

Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.

GameIntel Arc A310GTX 1050Winner
Grand Theft Auto IV: Complete Edition12FPS14FPSGTX 1050
Grand Theft Auto VI9FPS11FPSGTX 1050
Marvel 1943: Rise of Hydra11FPS13FPSGTX 1050
Marathon11FPS13FPSGTX 1050
Gears of War: E-Day10FPS12FPSGTX 1050
Onimusha: Way of the Sword12FPS15FPSGTX 1050
Phantom Blade Zero11FPS13FPSGTX 1050
007 First Light11FPS13FPSGTX 1050
The Blood of Dawnwalker10FPS12FPSGTX 1050
Pathologic 314FPS17FPSGTX 1050

Verdict

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 wins in 10 out of 10 games

We recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 as the best option for gaming.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions when comparing the Intel Arc A310 with the GTX 1050.

Which is better, the Intel Arc A310 or the GTX 1050?

On average at 1080p, the GTX 1050 is 18% faster than the Intel Arc A310. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.

Which is better at 4K?

At 4K Ultra, the Intel Arc A310 averages 5 FPS and the GTX 1050 5 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.

Is it worth paying more for the faster one?

At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.

Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?

AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.

How big is the FPS difference between them?

On average across top games, the gap is around 18% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.

Related Comparisons

Intel Arc A310 vs RX 560Intel Arc A310 vs GTX 960Intel Arc A310 vs GTX 950GTX 1050 vs GTX 1630GTX 1050 vs R9 380GTX 1050 vs Intel Arc A380

CheckFPS

CheckFPS was created by Lluis Enric Mayans, a PC hardware and graphics performance specialist. 200+ games, 135 GPUs, and real benchmark data to help you make better decisions.

200+ games · 135+ GPUs · 141+ CPUs

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Cookie Policy

Useful Links

  • Contact
  • About Us

Data sources & methodology

  • How we calculate FPS
🇪🇸Español🇬🇧English🇧🇷Português

© 2026 CheckFPS. All rights reserved.