Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Detailed gaming performance comparison
Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400
We compare the Intel Arc A310 and the GTX 960 with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.
The GTX 960 is ~18% faster than the Intel Arc A310 on average at 1080p. On top of that, the Intel Arc A310 is 50% cheaper (launch price).
Intel Arc A310
- Index (1080p)
- 10/100
- VRAM
- 4 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $99 · ≈ €91
- Upscaling
- XeSS
GTX 960
- Index (1080p)
- 12/100
- VRAM
- 2 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $199 · ≈ €183
- Upscaling
- FSR
Average FPS by resolution
Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.
| Resolution | Intel Arc A310 | GTX 960 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 11 | 13 | +18% |
| 1440p | 6 | 8 | +33% |
| 4K | 5 | 5 | = |
Specifications
Side-by-side specs of the Intel Arc A310 and GTX 960: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.
| Spec | Intel Arc A310 | GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Intel | NVIDIA |
| VRAM | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| TDP | 30W | 120W |
| Tier | Entry-level | Entry-level |
| Score 1080p | 10 | 12 |
| Score 1440p | 6 | 8 |
| Score 4K | 2 | 3 |
| Price (MSRP) | $99 | $199 |
Gaming Performance
Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.
| Game | Intel Arc A310 | GTX 960 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grand Theft Auto IV: Complete Edition | 12FPS | 14FPS | GTX 960 |
| Grand Theft Auto VI | 9FPS | 11FPS | GTX 960 |
| Marvel 1943: Rise of Hydra | 11FPS | 13FPS | GTX 960 |
| Marathon | 11FPS | 13FPS | GTX 960 |
| Gears of War: E-Day | 10FPS | 12FPS | GTX 960 |
| Onimusha: Way of the Sword | 12FPS | 15FPS | GTX 960 |
| Phantom Blade Zero | 11FPS | 13FPS | GTX 960 |
| 007 First Light | 11FPS | 13FPS | GTX 960 |
| The Blood of Dawnwalker | 10FPS | 12FPS | GTX 960 |
| Pathologic 3 | 14FPS | 17FPS | GTX 960 |
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 wins in 10 out of 10 games
We recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 as the best option for gaming.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions when comparing the Intel Arc A310 with the GTX 960.
Which is better, the Intel Arc A310 or the GTX 960?
On average at 1080p, the GTX 960 is 18% faster than the Intel Arc A310. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.
Which is better at 4K?
At 4K Ultra, the Intel Arc A310 averages 5 FPS and the GTX 960 5 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.
Is it worth paying more for the faster one?
At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.
Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?
AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.
How big is the FPS difference between them?
On average across top games, the gap is around 18% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.