CheckFPS
HomeFPS CalculatorGPUsCompare GPUsOptimize FPS
God of War Ragnarök
Optimization guide · Updated on July 13, 2026

How to improve FPS in God of War Ragnarök (PC)

God of War Ragnarök arrived on PC in 2024 confirming something already suspected since the 2018 port: Santa Monica Studio knows how to adapt its proprietary engine to PC architecture better than almost any other PlayStation studio. This is, simply put, one of Sony's best ports to date, without the endless shader-compilation hangs or the launch bugs that plagued other exclusives. The engine, evolved since 2018, adds ray tracing in reflections and shadows, much denser geometry in settings like Asgard, and the full modern trio of upscalers: DLSS 3 with Frame Generation, FSR 3.1, and XeSS. The result is a game that scales with unusual elegance from a GTX 1060 all the way up to an RTX 4090, as long as you know which settings to touch first.

⚠️ Known for: The massive battles against waves of einherjar in Valhalla and the final fights with multiple enemies, particles, dynamic shadows, and simultaneous Rage effects on screen are by far the game's toughest stress test: this is where mid-range CPUs start showing 1% low drops, even when the GPU has plenty of headroom.
Example with your hardware

This is what you'd gain with a NVIDIA RTX 3050

Without optimization (Ultra)
30 FPS
1080p · Ultra · no DLSS
With this guide applied
~55 FPS
1080p · Recommended settings
+ DLSS Quality
~70 FPS
1080p · Settings + DLSS
Logo nvidia
amazonAffiliate link

Want the RTX 3050 at the best price?

Check the current price on Amazon.

View on Amazon →

Calculations based on our FPS model combined with the % gain of each setting (measured in public benchmarks).

1. Quick wins (no visual loss)

Start here. Each one adds a little, but together they give +48% free FPS.

Shadows

Recommended: High · Visual impact: Low · Consensus: It's the most recommended setting by the optimization community: Ultra barely adds extra sharpness for the frametime cost, especially in scenes with einherjar or multiple enemies.
+12% FPS

Lowering from Ultra to High reduces shadow map resolution and dynamic shadow distance in scenes with many NPCs without it being much noticeable in normal combat; only in close-ups with grazing light is the step down perceptible.

Ray-Traced Reflections

Recommended: Off · Visual impact: Medium · Consensus: Near-unanimous recommendation on GPUs below an RTX 4070: the frametime cost doesn't pay off for the improvement, which is subtle given the game's semi-fixed camera.
+18% FPS

The reflections RT mostly affects wet surfaces, ice, and polished metal in Midgard and Vanaheim. Disabling it returns to screen-space reflections, which remain accurate from most of the game's camera angles.

Vegetation Density

Recommended: Medium · Visual impact: Imperceptible · Consensus: Highly recommended setting on CPU-limited configurations; the visual impact is minimal except in static shots taken with Photo Mode.
+8% FPS

Reduces the amount of instanced grass and foliage in Vanaheim's outdoor zones and Midgard's forests, one of the biggest CPU performance consumers due to the number of drawn objects.

Volumetric Fog Quality

Recommended: Medium · Visual impact: Low · Consensus: Recommended on mid-range GPUs; on high-end cards the impact is marginal, so many users prefer to leave it at High.
+7% FPS

Volumetric fog on Ultra uses more samples per view column, noticeable in areas like Alfheim or the dwarf caves. Lowering it to Medium keeps the atmosphere without the cost of the extra samples.

Motion Blur

Recommended: Off · Visual impact: Imperceptible · Consensus: More an aesthetic recommendation than a performance one; almost the entire community disables it regardless of hardware.
+3% FPS

Provides a small performance gain, but it's recommended mainly because it improves perceived sharpness in combat and reduces visual fatigue in the dynamic QTE cameras.

2. Medium impact settings

Here's where most of the FPS is. Minor visual impact, major performance impact.

Texture Resolution

Recommended: High · Visual impact: Low · Consensus: Recommended to tune based on available VRAM rather than pure performance: on 8GB cards, it's the setting that does the most to prevent microstutters in the densest areas.
+6% FPS

Lowering from Ultra to High frees up VRAM without noticeably degrading sharpness except on 12GB+ cards where there's no need to touch it. Critical on 8GB GPUs like the RTX 3070 to avoid stutter from VRAM saturation in Asgard.

Ambient Occlusion

Recommended: Medium · Visual impact: Low · Consensus: A setting consistently cited as good value in optimization forums, with a visual difference that's hard to spot outside of direct comparisons.
+9% FPS

AO on Ultra uses a larger sampling radius, noticeable mainly indoors with lots of geometric detail like Brok and Sindri's workshop. Medium keeps contact shadows in corners without the extra cost.

Particle and Effects Quality

Recommended: High · Visual impact: Medium · Consensus: The setting with the biggest direct impact on the game's worst-case scenario (mass battles); especially recommended if you're playing on a mid-range CPU.
+10% FPS

The massive battles against einherjar and boss fights generate an enormous number of particles (Kratos's Rage, Atreus's ice, elemental effects). Lowering from Ultra to High reduces the number of simultaneous particles without visually emptying out combat.

Hair Quality

Recommended: Medium · Visual impact: Low · Consensus: Recommended to lower on configurations with an RX 6600 or equivalent; on high-end setups it's usually kept, given its visual weight in cutscenes.
+5% FPS

Hair simulation for Kratos, Freya, and Thor on Ultra adds a per-strand shading cost that's barely noticeable except in real-time cutscenes, which already benefit less from high settings due to their camera pacing.

LOD Distance

Recommended: Medium · Visual impact: Medium · Consensus: A debated setting: some users prefer to keep it high because of visible pop-in at Medium while using the Alfheim Explorer; worth testing before settling on a value.
+7% FPS

Reduces the distance at which max-detail models load, especially noticeable in Vanaheim's open spaces. The impact is greater during exploration than in close combat.

3. Upscaling (DLSS / FSR / XeSS)

The biggest gain in the game. Compatible with almost any modern GPU.

NVIDIA DLSS 3 (with Frame Generation)

+55% FPS

Full DLSS 3 support including Frame Generation on RTX 40-series GPUs. The implementation is one of the cleanest of 2024: in Quality mode motion clarity stays high even during QTEs with fast camera movement. Frame Generation adds notable smoothness at 4K with RT enabled, though it increases input lag slightly, almost imperceptible in a game with a combat pace more measured than a shooter.

AMD FSR 3.1

+40% FPS

FSR 3.1 with the game's native Frame Generation, decoupled from driver-level Fluid Motion Frames. It works on any modern GPU, not just Radeon. Image quality in Quality mode is solid, though it shows somewhat more ghosting than DLSS on hair and volumetric fog during sharp camera movements.

Intel XeSS

+35% FPS

Full XeSS implementation, with better performance on Arc GPUs thanks to the XMX path, though it also runs in DP4a mode on NVIDIA and AMD GPUs. Image stability is somewhat inferior to DLSS in dense vegetation, but it's a perfectly playable alternative in Balanced or Performance.

NVIDIA DLAA

+0% FPS

Native DLSS-based antialiasing with no resolution rescaling, aimed at those with GPU headroom to spare who prefer maximum sharpness over an FPS gain. Recommended on RTX 4080/4090 at 1440p if you prioritize image quality over framerate.

4. Tips by GPU

NVIDIA

  • •Enable Reflex from the graphics menu: it notably reduces input lag in parry-based combat, with no measurable performance cost.
  • •On RTX 30 series, avoid combining reflections RT with a high internal resolution; the optimal balance is RT off + DLSS Quality except on the 3080/3090.
  • •Always update to the latest Game Ready driver before playing: Santa Monica has released several optimization patches coordinated with NVIDIA drivers since launch.

AMD

  • •On RX 6000/7000, disable shadow RT first, before reflections: it has a higher relative cost on RDNA architecture than on Ada Lovelace.
  • •FSR 3.1 Frame Generation works better with V-Sync or an FPS cap enabled to avoid perceptible tearing during camera pans.
  • •Smart Access Memory (Resizable BAR) gives a measurable improvement in this specific game, more than the generational average: verify it's enabled in the BIOS.

Sistema

  • •Install the game on an SSD (preferably NVMe): texture streaming loads while walking through Asgard are noticeably slower on HDD, with visible pop-in.
  • •Let shader precompilation finish on first launch without skipping it: it avoids the compilation stutter that did affect other PlayStation ports.
  • •16GB of RAM is more than enough; with 8GB there can be swapping in Vanaheim's densest zones, so 16GB is recommended as a real minimum, not just the official requirement.

5. Known game issues

1% low drops in massive battles against einherjar

Even on systems with GPU headroom to spare, simultaneous enemy waves in Valhalla generate load spikes on a single CPU core that cause punctual framerate drops. It's a CPU bottleneck, not a GPU one, so lowering graphics settings barely helps; lowering particle density helps more.

Traversal stutter when fast traveling between realms

Some users report a small shader-loading or streaming pause when using the Bifröst portals for the first time each session. It's almost entirely mitigated after the first trip to each realm in the session.

Estado: May 2024 patch

Occasional DLSS Frame Generation incompatibility with VRR on some monitors

In combination with G-Sync/FreeSync on some specific panels, enabling Frame Generation together with VRR can cause noticeable flickering or brightness fluctuation in dark scenes like the Svartalfheim caves. Temporarily disabling VRR or setting an FPS cap resolves the issue.

6. Frequently asked questions

Is it true this is one of the best PlayStation ports on PC?▾
Yes, and rightly so: Santa Monica Studio had already shown good work with 2018's God of War, and with Ragnarök they refined the process even further. There are no serious shader-compilation stutter problems at launch, the graphics options scale broadly and granularly, and DLSS/FSR/XeSS support arrived complete from day one.
Do I need a ray-tracing-capable GPU to play it well?▾
No. Ray tracing in Ragnarök mostly affects reflections and shadows subtly, and the game is very well optimized for traditional rasterized rendering. A GPU without dedicated RT support can play it perfectly well at medium-high settings at 1080p.
What causes FPS drops in big battles if my GPU isn't at 100%?▾
It's a CPU bottleneck. Fights with multiple einherjar, complex Atreus/Freya AI, and many simultaneous effects mostly load a single CPU core for game logic and physics. Lowering purely graphical settings doesn't help as much as reducing particle density.
Is DLSS Frame Generation worth it in this game?▾
Yes, especially at 1440p/4K with ray tracing enabled. Being a combat game with a semi-fixed camera and a more measured pace than a competitive shooter, the input lag increase from Frame Generation is much less perceptible than in faster genres, while the smoothness gain is notable.

Want to know exactly how many FPS YOUR PC will get?

Enter your GPU and CPU in our calculator and measure the real impact of each setting.

Calculate FPS for God of War Ragnarök →

Calculations based on consensus of technical sources and our own FPS model. More about our methodology →

EnebaGame keys on sale

Upcoming games, cheaper with an official key.

  • Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced

    Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced

    View on Eneba →

  • Halo: Campaign Evolved

    Halo: Campaign Evolved

    View on Eneba →

  • Beast of Reincarnation

    Beast of Reincarnation

    View on Eneba →

  • The Sinking City 2

    The Sinking City 2

    View on Eneba →

  • Resonance: A Plague Tale Legacy

    Resonance: A Plague Tale Legacy

    View on Eneba →

  • Star Wars Zero Company

    Star Wars Zero Company

    View on Eneba →

  • The Blood of Dawnwalker

    The Blood of Dawnwalker

    View on Eneba →

  • Halloween: The Game

    Halloween: The Game

    View on Eneba →

  • Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War IV

    Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War IV

    View on Eneba →

  • Silent Hill: Townfall

    Silent Hill: Townfall

    View on Eneba →

Affiliate link

FPS in the most searched games

  • Forza Horizon 6

    Forza Horizon 6 FPS

    Racing

  • Gothic 1 Remake

    Gothic 1 Remake FPS

    Action RPG

  • Subnautica 2

    Subnautica 2 FPS

    Survival

  • 007 First Light

    007 First Light FPS

    Action-Adventure

  • Pragmata

    Pragmata FPS

    Action-Adventure

  • EA Sports FC 26

    EA Sports FC 26 FPS

    Sports

  • ARK: Survival Ascended

    ARK: Survival Ascended FPS

    Survival

  • Final Fantasy VII Rebirth

    Final Fantasy VII Rebirth FPS

    RPG

  • Call of Duty: Warzone

    Call of Duty: Warzone FPS

    Battle Royale

  • Cyberpunk 2077

    Cyberpunk 2077 FPS

    RPG

Performance of the most searched GPUs

  • NVIDIARTX 406055 FPS
  • NVIDIARTX 306048 FPS
  • NVIDIARTX 305035 FPS
  • NVIDIARTX 507092 FPS
  • NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti62 FPS

CheckFPS

CheckFPS was created by Lluis Enric Mayans, a PC hardware and graphics performance specialist. 200+ games, 135 GPUs, and real benchmark data to help you make better decisions.

200+ games · 135+ GPUs · 141+ CPUs

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Cookie Policy

Useful Links

  • Contact
  • About Us

Data sources & methodology

  • How we calculate FPS
🇪🇸Español🇬🇧English🇧🇷Português🇩🇪Deutsch🇫🇷Français

As an Amazon Associate and Eneba affiliate, CheckFPS earns from qualifying purchases. This does not affect our recommendations or performance estimates.

© 2026 CheckFPS. All rights reserved.