CheckFPS
HomeFPS CalculatorGPUsCompare GPUsOptimize FPS

AMD Radeon RX 560 vs Intel Arc A310

Detailed gaming performance comparison

Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400

We compare the RX 560 and the Intel Arc A310 with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.

The RX 560 is ~9% faster than the Intel Arc A310 on average at 1080p.

RX 560

Index (1080p)
11/100
VRAM
4 GB
Price (MSRP)
$99 · ≈ €91
Upscaling
FSR

Intel Arc A310

Index (1080p)
10/100
VRAM
4 GB
Price (MSRP)
$99 · ≈ €91
Upscaling
XeSS

Average FPS by resolution

Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.

ResolutionRX 560Intel Arc A310Difference
1080p1211+9%
1440p76+17%
4K55=

Specifications

Side-by-side specs of the RX 560 and Intel Arc A310: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.

SpecRX 560Intel Arc A310
BrandAMDIntel
VRAM4 GB4 GB
TDP80W30W
TierEntry-levelEntry-level
Score 1080p1110
Score 1440p76
Score 4K32
Price (MSRP)$99$99

Gaming Performance

Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.

GameRX 560Intel Arc A310Winner
Grand Theft Auto IV: Complete Edition13FPS12FPSRX 560
Grand Theft Auto VI10FPS9FPSRX 560
Marvel 1943: Rise of Hydra12FPS11FPSRX 560
Marathon12FPS11FPSRX 560
Gears of War: E-Day11FPS10FPSRX 560
Onimusha: Way of the Sword13FPS12FPSRX 560
Phantom Blade Zero12FPS11FPSRX 560
007 First Light12FPS11FPSRX 560
The Blood of Dawnwalker11FPS10FPSRX 560
Pathologic 315FPS14FPSRX 560

Verdict

AMD Radeon RX 560 wins in 10 out of 10 games

We recommend AMD Radeon RX 560 as the best option for gaming.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions when comparing the RX 560 with the Intel Arc A310.

Which is better, the RX 560 or the Intel Arc A310?

On average at 1080p, the RX 560 is 9% faster than the Intel Arc A310. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.

Which is better at 4K?

At 4K Ultra, the RX 560 averages 5 FPS and the Intel Arc A310 5 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.

Is it worth paying more for the faster one?

At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.

Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?

AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.

How big is the FPS difference between them?

On average across top games, the gap is around 9% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.

Related Comparisons

RX 560 vs GTX 950RX 560 vs GTX 1630RX 560 vs GTX 960Intel Arc A310 vs GTX 1050Intel Arc A310 vs R9 380Intel Arc A310 vs GTX 750 Ti

CheckFPS

CheckFPS was created by Lluis Enric Mayans, a PC hardware and graphics performance specialist. 200+ games, 135 GPUs, and real benchmark data to help you make better decisions.

200+ games · 135+ GPUs · 141+ CPUs

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Cookie Policy

Useful Links

  • Contact
  • About Us

Data sources & methodology

  • How we calculate FPS
🇪🇸Español🇬🇧English🇧🇷Português

© 2026 CheckFPS. All rights reserved.