NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs Intel Arc A310
Detailed gaming performance comparison
Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400
We compare the GTX 1630 and the Intel Arc A310 with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.
The GTX 1630 and the Intel Arc A310 perform almost identically; price and features make the difference.
GTX 1630
- Index (1080p)
- 10/100
- VRAM
- 4 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $150 · ≈ €138
- Upscaling
- FSR
Intel Arc A310
- Index (1080p)
- 10/100
- VRAM
- 4 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $99 · ≈ €91
- Upscaling
- XeSS
Average FPS by resolution
Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.
| Resolution | GTX 1630 | Intel Arc A310 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 11 | 11 | = |
| 1440p | 6 | 6 | = |
| 4K | 5 | 5 | = |
Specifications
Side-by-side specs of the GTX 1630 and Intel Arc A310: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.
| Spec | GTX 1630 | Intel Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | NVIDIA | Intel |
| VRAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| TDP | 75W | 30W |
| Tier | Entry-level | Entry-level |
| Score 1080p | 10 | 10 |
| Score 1440p | 6 | 6 |
| Score 4K | 2 | 2 |
| Price (MSRP) | $150 | $99 |
Gaming Performance
Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.
| Game | GTX 1630 | Intel Arc A310 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grand Theft Auto IV: Complete Edition | 12FPS | 12FPS | Tie |
| Grand Theft Auto VI | 9FPS | 9FPS | Tie |
| Marvel 1943: Rise of Hydra | 11FPS | 11FPS | Tie |
| Marathon | 11FPS | 11FPS | Tie |
| Gears of War: E-Day | 10FPS | 10FPS | Tie |
| Onimusha: Way of the Sword | 12FPS | 12FPS | Tie |
| Phantom Blade Zero | 11FPS | 11FPS | Tie |
| 007 First Light | 11FPS | 11FPS | Tie |
| The Blood of Dawnwalker | 10FPS | 10FPS | Tie |
| Pathologic 3 | 14FPS | 14FPS | Tie |
Verdict
It's a tie: both GPUs win in 0 out of 10 games
Both GPUs offer very similar performance. Choose based on price and availability.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions when comparing the GTX 1630 with the Intel Arc A310.
Which is better, the GTX 1630 or the Intel Arc A310?
On average at 1080p, the GTX 1630 is 0% faster than the Intel Arc A310. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.
Which is better at 4K?
At 4K Ultra, the GTX 1630 averages 5 FPS and the Intel Arc A310 5 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.
Is it worth paying more for the faster one?
At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.
Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?
AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.
How big is the FPS difference between them?
On average across top games, the gap is around 0% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.