How Many FPS Does NARAKA: BLADEPOINT Get with GTX 1650? Performance at 1080p, 1440p & 4K
Want the GTX 1650 at the best price?
Check the current price on Amazon.
NARAKA: BLADEPOINT system requirements
Official minimum and recommended requirements published by the developer.
Minimum
Recommended
Game keys on saleUpcoming games, cheaper with an official key.
Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced
View on Eneba →
Halo: Campaign Evolved
View on Eneba →
Beast of Reincarnation
View on Eneba →
The Sinking City 2
View on Eneba →
Resonance: A Plague Tale Legacy
View on Eneba →
Star Wars Zero Company
View on Eneba →
The Blood of Dawnwalker
View on Eneba →
Halloween: The Game
View on Eneba →
Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War IV
View on Eneba →
Silent Hill: Townfall
View on Eneba →
Control Resonant
View on Eneba →
Ace Combat 8: Wings of Theve
View on Eneba →
Gears of War: E-Day
View on Eneba →
Affiliate link
GTX 1650 Specifications
Want the exact NARAKA: BLADEPOINT FPS with your GTX 1650?
These FPS assume a reference CPU. Add your real processor and RAM and we'll tailor the estimate to your rig.
- Estimate tailored to your rig
- Customize resolution, quality, and RAM
NARAKA: BLADEPOINT benchmark on GTX 1650: FPS by resolution and quality
Pick yours and we recalculate the whole table above with it.
NARAKA: BLADEPOINT FPS with a GTX 1650 and a Intel Core i5-13400
| Quality | 1080p (Full HD) | 1440p (2K) | 4K (Ultra HD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultra | 36FPS min 32Acceptable | 22FPS min 20Poor | 9FPS min 8Unplayable |
| High | 47FPS min 41Acceptable | 29FPS min 26Poor | 11FPS min 10Unplayable |
| Medium | 62FPS min 55Good | 38FPS min 34Acceptable | 15FPS min 13Poor |
| Low | 80FPS min 71Good | 49FPS min 44Acceptable | 19FPS min 17Poor |
| Bottleneck (estimated) | GPU 42% | GPU 64% | GPU 86% |
The percentage estimates how much of the stronger component's capability goes unused because of the other one.
This one does matter: from the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 downwards the processor becomes the brake on the GTX 1650. There is 3% between the slowest and fastest CPU in the table. One caveat: this is at 1080p, where the CPU weighs most. At 1440p and 4K the graphics card takes over and the processor stops mattering.
FSR performance: FPS with AI upscaling
Upscaling renders NARAKA: BLADEPOINT at a lower internal resolution and reconstructs the image, so you trade a little sharpness for extra frames. These are the estimated figures for the GTX 1650 with FSR enabled, starting from its native Ultra FPS.
| Resolution | Native | FSR Quality | FSR Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 36 | 45 | 52 |
| 1440p | 22 | 30 | 36 |
| 4K | 9 | 13 | 17 |
About ray tracing: every figure on this page is with ray tracing off. The GTX 1650 has no dedicated hardware for it, so it is an option best left disabled.
Estimated figures. The real gain varies by game and by the version of the technology.
Is the CPU or the graphics card holding you back?
These FPS assume a mid-range CPU that isn't a bottleneck — roughly a Intel Core i5-13400 — and 16 GB of RAM.
Here the graphics card is the brake: the GTX 1650 is what caps the frame rate in NARAKA: BLADEPOINT. A faster processor would hardly change the result.
Is the GTX 1650 Enough for NARAKA: BLADEPOINT?
The GTX 1650 delivers 36 FPS at 1080p Ultra in NARAKA: BLADEPOINT. Performance is acceptable but not ideal. Consider lowering the resolution or quality.
At 1440p it gets 22 FPS and at 4K 9 FPS at Ultra quality.
This GPU does not reach 60 FPS at 1080p Ultra
View recommended GPUs for NARAKA: BLADEPOINT→Want more FPS in NARAKA: BLADEPOINT?
Our guide collects the settings that give between +40% and +90% FPS in NARAKA: BLADEPOINT with barely any visual loss. Recommended settings, GPU-specific tips (NVIDIA/AMD/Intel) and solutions to common game issues.
