
How Many FPS Does Control Resonant Get with Arc A580? Performance at 1080p, 1440p & 4K

Don't have Control Resonant yet?
Get it cheaper with an official key on Eneba.
Want the Arc A580 at the best price?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Upcoming games, cheaper with an official key.
Affiliate link
Arc A580 Specifications
These are the basic specs. The full Arc A580 page adds the rest of the technical data and its FPS game by game, not just in Control Resonant.
Want the exact Control Resonant FPS with your Arc A580?
These FPS assume a reference CPU. Add your real processor and RAM and we'll tailor the estimate to your rig.
- Estimate tailored to your rig
- Customize resolution, quality, and RAM
Control Resonant benchmark on Arc A580: FPS by resolution and quality
Pick yours and we recalculate the whole table above with it.
Control Resonant FPS with a Arc A580 and a Intel Core i5-13400
| Quality | 1080p (Full HD) | 1440p (2K) | 4K (Ultra HD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultra | 30FPS min 27Acceptable | 21FPS min 19Poor | 9FPS min 8Unplayable |
| High | 39FPS min 35Acceptable | 27FPS min 24Poor | 12FPS min 11Unplayable |
| Medium | 51FPS min 45Acceptable | 36FPS min 32Acceptable | 16FPS min 14Poor |
| Low | 66FPS min 58Good | 46FPS min 41Acceptable | 20FPS min 18Poor |
| Bottleneck (estimated) | GPU 52% | GPU 66% | GPU 85% |
The percentage estimates how much of the stronger component's capability goes unused because of the other one.
Almost any modern CPU performs the same here: there is only 0% between the slowest and the fastest in the table. If you were wondering whether to upgrade your processor for Control Resonant, it is not worth it. One caveat: this is at 1080p, where the CPU weighs most. At 1440p and 4K the graphics card takes over and the processor stops mattering.
XeSS performance: FPS with AI upscaling
Upscaling renders Control Resonant at a lower internal resolution and reconstructs the image, so you trade a little sharpness for extra frames. These are the estimated figures for the Arc A580 with XeSS enabled, starting from its native Ultra FPS.
| Resolution | Native | XeSS Quality | XeSS Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 30 | 38 | 44 |
| 1440p | 21 | 28 | 35 |
| 4K | 9 | 13 | 17 |
About ray tracing: every figure on this page is with ray tracing off. The Arc A580 does have dedicated hardware for it, so you can turn it on in games that implement it. The FPS cost swings widely depending on how much ray tracing each title uses, and XeSS is exactly what people lean on to pay for it.
Estimated figures. The real gain varies by game and by the version of the technology.
Is the CPU or the graphics card holding you back?
These FPS assume a mid-range CPU that isn't a bottleneck — roughly a Intel Core i5-13400 — and 16 GB of RAM.
Here the graphics card is the brake: the Arc A580 is what caps the frame rate in Control Resonant. A faster processor would hardly change the result.
Is the Arc A580 Enough for Control Resonant?
The Arc A580 delivers 30 FPS at 1080p Ultra in Control Resonant. Performance is acceptable but not ideal. Consider lowering the resolution or quality.
At 1440p it gets 21 FPS and at 4K 9 FPS at Ultra quality.
This GPU does not reach 60 FPS at 1080p Ultra
View recommended GPUs for Control Resonant→Want more FPS in Control Resonant?
Our guide collects the settings that give between +40% and +90% FPS in Control Resonant with barely any visual loss. Recommended settings, GPU-specific tips (NVIDIA/AMD/Intel) and solutions to common game issues.
Arc A580 or RX 6650M for Control Resonant?
In Control Resonant at 1080p Ultra, the Arc A580 gets 30 FPS and the RX 6650M 31 FPS. The RX 6650M is 3% ahead.
Arc A580 vs RX 6650M: which one is faster?Other GPUs for Control Resonant
If none of these convinces you for Control Resonant, the full ranking sorts all 143 cards by real FPS, not synthetic scores.
See the full graphics card ranking by real FPS



















