
How Many FPS Does Control Resonant Get with RX 6900 XT? Performance at 1080p, 1440p & 4K

Don't have Control Resonant yet?
Get it cheaper with an official key on Eneba.

Want the RX 6900 XT at the best price?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Upcoming games, cheaper with an official key.
Affiliate link
RX 6900 XT Specifications
These are the basic specs. The full RX 6900 XT page adds the rest of the technical data and its FPS game by game, not just in Control Resonant.
Want the exact Control Resonant FPS with your RX 6900 XT?
These FPS assume a reference CPU. Add your real processor and RAM and we'll tailor the estimate to your rig.
- Estimate tailored to your rig
- Customize resolution, quality, and RAM
Control Resonant benchmark on RX 6900 XT: FPS by resolution and quality
Pick yours and we recalculate the whole table above with it.
Control Resonant FPS with a RX 6900 XT and a Intel Core i5-13400
| Quality | 1080p (Full HD) | 1440p (2K) | 4K (Ultra HD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultra | 61FPS min 53Good | 51FPS min 45Acceptable | 32FPS min 28Acceptable |
| High | 79FPS min 69Good | 67FPS min 59Good | 42FPS min 37Acceptable |
| Medium | 103FPS min 90Good | 87FPS min 76Good | 54FPS min 48Acceptable |
| Low | 134FPS min 117Excellent | 113FPS min 99Good | 70FPS min 62Good |
| Bottleneck (estimated) | balanced | GPU 18% | GPU 49% |
The percentage estimates how much of the stronger component's capability goes unused because of the other one.
This one does matter: from the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 downwards the processor becomes the brake on the RX 6900 XT. There is 11% between the slowest and fastest CPU in the table. One caveat: this is at 1080p, where the CPU weighs most. At 1440p and 4K the graphics card takes over and the processor stops mattering.
FSR performance: FPS with AI upscaling
Upscaling renders Control Resonant at a lower internal resolution and reconstructs the image, so you trade a little sharpness for extra frames. These are the estimated figures for the RX 6900 XT with FSR enabled, starting from its native Ultra FPS.
| Resolution | Native | FSR Quality | FSR Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 61 | 76 | 88 |
| 1440p | 51 | 69 | 84 |
| 4K | 32 | 46 | 59 |
About ray tracing: every figure on this page is with ray tracing off. The RX 6900 XT does have dedicated hardware for it, so you can turn it on in games that implement it. The FPS cost swings widely depending on how much ray tracing each title uses, and FSR is exactly what people lean on to pay for it.
Estimated figures. The real gain varies by game and by the version of the technology.
Is the CPU or the graphics card holding you back?
These FPS assume a mid-range CPU that isn't a bottleneck — roughly a Intel Core i5-13400 — and 16 GB of RAM.
The RX 6900 XT and that processor are well matched in Control Resonant: neither clearly holds the other back, so the table figures are a fair reflection of the pair. At 4K it flips: there the graphics card becomes the limit.
Is the RX 6900 XT Enough for Control Resonant?
The RX 6900 XT delivers 61 FPS at 1080p Ultra in Control Resonant. Enough for a smooth 60 FPS experience. For 144Hz, lower the quality to High.
At 1440p it gets 51 FPS and at 4K 32 FPS at Ultra quality.
Want more FPS in Control Resonant?
Our guide collects the settings that give between +40% and +90% FPS in Control Resonant with barely any visual loss. Recommended settings, GPU-specific tips (NVIDIA/AMD/Intel) and solutions to common game issues.
RX 6900 XT or RTX 3080 12GB for Control Resonant?
In Control Resonant at 1080p Ultra both land on the same figure: 61 FPS. Price and power draw are what separate them.
RX 6900 XT vs RTX 3080 12GB: which one is faster?Other GPUs for Control Resonant
If none of these convinces you for Control Resonant, the full ranking sorts all 143 cards by real FPS, not synthetic scores.
See the full graphics card ranking by real FPS





















