AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT: real performance and FPS — which is better? Full comparison
Detailed gaming performance comparison
Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400
We compare the RX 9060 XT 16GB and the RX 6800 XT with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.
The RX 6800 XT is ~1% faster than the RX 9060 XT 16GB on average at 1080p. On top of that, the RX 9060 XT 16GB is 46% cheaper (launch price).
RX 9060 XT 16GB
- Index (1080p)
- 66/100
- VRAM
- 16 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $349 · ≈ €321
- $/FPS (value)
- $5.06 · ≈ €4.65
- Upscaling
- FSR + Frame Gen
RX 6800 XT
- Index (1080p)
- 67/100
- VRAM
- 16 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $649 · ≈ €597
- $/FPS (value)
- $9.27 · ≈ €8.53
- Upscaling
- FSR
Average FPS by resolution
Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.
| Resolution | RX 9060 XT 16GB | RX 6800 XT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 69 | 70 | +1% |
| 1440p | 49 | 59 | +20% |
| 4K | 25 | 36 | +44% |
Which one for your resolution?
RX 6800 XT is the best pick at all three resolutions, averaging 22% more FPS.
Specifications
Side-by-side specs of the RX 9060 XT 16GB and RX 6800 XT: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.
| Spec | RX 9060 XT 16GB | RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | AMD | AMD |
| VRAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| TDP | 150W | 300W |
| Tier | Mid-range | High-end |
| Score 1080p | 66 | 67 |
| Score 1440p | 54 | 64 |
| Score 4K | 35 | 51 |
| Price (MSRP) | $349 | $649 |
| Architecture | RDNA 4 | RDNA 2 |
| Process Node | TSMC N4P | TSMC 7nm |
| Shading Units (CUDA/Stream) | 2048 | 4608 |
| RT Cores | 32 | 72 |
| Texture Units (TMUs) | 128 | 288 |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 |
| Base Clock | 1880 MHz | 1825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 3130 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| FP32 Performance (Teraflops) | 25.6 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Clock | 20000 MHz | 16000 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit | 256-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| PCIe Version | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Transistor Count | 29.7B | 26.8B |
| Release Date | 2025-06-05 | 2020-11-18 |
Power & efficiency
TDP doesn't tell the whole story: here's how much each GPU delivers per watt it draws.
RX 9060 XT 16GB
- TDP
- 150W
- FPS/W
- 0.46
RX 6800 XT
- TDP
- 300W
- FPS/W
- 0.23
The RX 9060 XT 16GB is more efficient: it draws 150W less and delivers more per watt, though the RX 6800 XT is still the faster card overall.
What FPS do these GPUs get in your game?
Pick the GPU and the game, and we'll take you straight to its real FPS.
Pick the GPU
Gaming Performance
Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.
| Game | RX 9060 XT 16GB | RX 6800 XT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 78 | 80 | RX 6800 XT |
 | 69 | 71 | RX 6800 XT |
 | 56 | 57 | RX 6800 XT |
 | 60 | 61 | RX 6800 XT |
 | 62 | 63 | RX 6800 XT |
| 59 | 60 | RX 6800 XT | |
 | 74 | 75 | RX 6800 XT |
 | 78 | 80 | RX 6800 XT |
 | 86 | 88 | RX 6800 XT |
 | 67 | 68 | RX 6800 XT |
Verdict
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT wins in 10 out of 10 games
At CheckFPS we measured both cards across 10 popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K on a reference CPU. The RX 6800 XT comes out ahead by around 1% more FPS on average, and that lead holds up as resolution climbs. That's why we recommend it as the most balanced option for gaming; still, if the price gap is wide, the other card remains a sensible buy.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions when comparing the RX 9060 XT 16GB with the RX 6800 XT.
Which is better, the RX 9060 XT 16GB or the RX 6800 XT?
On average at 1080p, the RX 6800 XT is 1% faster than the RX 9060 XT 16GB. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.
Which is better at 4K?
At 4K Ultra, the RX 9060 XT 16GB averages 25 FPS and the RX 6800 XT 36 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.
Is it worth paying more for the faster one?
At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.
Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?
AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.
How big is the FPS difference between them?
On average across top games, the gap is around 1% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.
9060 XT 16GB vs 6800 XT: what's the real difference?
In performance, the RX 6800 XT beats the RX 9060 XT 16GB by around 1% more FPS on average at 1080p — the gap shifts a bit by resolution, as shown in the table above. If you're torn between the 9060 XT 16GB and the 6800 XT on price, the price and $/FPS section above can help you decide.
