AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super: real performance and FPS — which is better? Full comparison
Detailed gaming performance comparison
Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400
We compare the RX 6950 XT and the RTX 4070 Super with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.
The RX 6950 XT is ~4% faster than the RTX 4070 Super on average at 1080p. On top of that, the RTX 4070 Super is 45% cheaper (launch price).
RX 6950 XT
- Index (1080p)
- 75/100
- VRAM
- 16 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $1099 · ≈ €1011
- $/FPS (value)
- $13.40 · ≈ €12.33
- Upscaling
- FSR
RTX 4070 Super
- Index (1080p)
- 73/100
- VRAM
- 12 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $599 · ≈ €551
- $/FPS (value)
- $7.58 · ≈ €6.98
- Upscaling
- DLSS + Frame Gen
Average FPS by resolution
Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.
| Resolution | RX 6950 XT | RTX 4070 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 82 | 79 | +4% |
| 1440p | 68 | 66 | +3% |
| 4K | 42 | 41 | +2% |
Which one for your resolution?
RX 6950 XT is the best pick at all three resolutions, averaging 3% more FPS.
Specifications
Side-by-side specs of the RX 6950 XT and RTX 4070 Super: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.
| Spec | RX 6950 XT | RTX 4070 Super |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | AMD | NVIDIA |
| VRAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| TDP | 335W | 220W |
| Tier | Enthusiast | High-end |
| Score 1080p | 75 | 73 |
| Score 1440p | 72 | 70 |
| Score 4K | 60 | 59 |
| Price (MSRP) | $1099 | $599 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | TSMC 7nm | TSMC 4N |
| Shading Units (CUDA/Stream) | 5120 | 7168 |
| RT Cores | 80 | 56 |
| Texture Units (TMUs) | 320 | 224 |
| ROPs | 128 | 80 |
| Base Clock | 1860 MHz | 1980 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2310 MHz | 2475 MHz |
| FP32 Performance (Teraflops) | 23.65 TFLOPS | 35.48 TFLOPS |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Clock | 18000 MHz | 21000 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 256-bit | 192-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 504 GB/s |
| PCIe Version | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Transistor Count | 26.8B | 35.8B |
| Release Date | 2022-05-10 | 2024-01-17 |
Power & efficiency
TDP doesn't tell the whole story: here's how much each GPU delivers per watt it draws.
RX 6950 XT
- TDP
- 335W
- FPS/W
- 0.24
RTX 4070 Super
- TDP
- 220W
- FPS/W
- 0.36
The RTX 4070 Super is more efficient: it draws 115W less and delivers more per watt, though the RX 6950 XT is still the faster card overall.
What FPS do these GPUs get in your game?
Pick the GPU and the game, and we'll take you straight to its real FPS.
Pick the GPU
Gaming Performance
Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.
| Game | RX 6950 XT | RTX 4070 Super | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 96 | 92 | RX 6950 XT |
 | 83 | 80 | RX 6950 XT |
 | 64 | 62 | RX 6950 XT |
 | 67 | 65 | RX 6950 XT |
 | 69 | 67 | RX 6950 XT |
| 66 | 65 | RX 6950 XT | |
 | 90 | 86 | RX 6950 XT |
 | 96 | 92 | RX 6950 XT |
 | 104 | 100 | RX 6950 XT |
 | 81 | 78 | RX 6950 XT |
Verdict
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT wins in 10 out of 10 games
At CheckFPS we measured both cards across 10 popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K on a reference CPU. The RX 6950 XT comes out ahead by around 4% more FPS on average, and that lead holds up as resolution climbs. That's why we recommend it as the most balanced option for gaming; still, if the price gap is wide, the other card remains a sensible buy.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions when comparing the RX 6950 XT with the RTX 4070 Super.
Which is better, the RX 6950 XT or the RTX 4070 Super?
On average at 1080p, the RX 6950 XT is 4% faster than the RTX 4070 Super. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.
Which is better at 4K?
At 4K Ultra, the RX 6950 XT averages 42 FPS and the RTX 4070 Super 41 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.
Is it worth paying more for the faster one?
At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.
Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?
AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.
How big is the FPS difference between them?
On average across top games, the gap is around 4% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.
6950 XT vs 4070 Super: what's the real difference?
In performance, the RX 6950 XT beats the RTX 4070 Super by around 4% more FPS on average at 1080p — the gap shifts a bit by resolution, as shown in the table above. If you're torn between the 6950 XT and the 4070 Super on price, the price and $/FPS section above can help you decide.
