AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super
Detailed gaming performance comparison
Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400
We compare the RX 6500 XT and the GTX 1650 Super with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.
The GTX 1650 Super is ~12% faster than the RX 6500 XT on average at 1080p. On top of that, the GTX 1650 Super is 20% cheaper (launch price).
RX 6500 XT
- Index (1080p)
- 22/100
- VRAM
- 4 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $199 · ≈ €183
- Upscaling
- FSR
GTX 1650 Super
- Index (1080p)
- 25/100
- VRAM
- 4 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $159 · ≈ €146
- Upscaling
- FSR
Average FPS by resolution
Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.
| Resolution | RX 6500 XT | GTX 1650 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 25 | 28 | +12% |
| 1440p | 14 | 18 | +29% |
| 4K | 5 | 7 | +40% |
Specifications
Side-by-side specs of the RX 6500 XT and GTX 1650 Super: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.
| Spec | RX 6500 XT | GTX 1650 Super |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | AMD | NVIDIA |
| VRAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| TDP | 107W | 100W |
| Tier | Entry-level | Entry-level |
| Score 1080p | 22 | 25 |
| Score 1440p | 14 | 18 |
| Score 4K | 6 | 9 |
| Price (MSRP) | $199 | $159 |
Gaming Performance
Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.
| Game | RX 6500 XT | GTX 1650 Super | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grand Theft Auto IV: Complete Edition | 26FPS | 29FPS | GTX 1650 Super |
| Grand Theft Auto VI | 20FPS | 22FPS | GTX 1650 Super |
| Marvel 1943: Rise of Hydra | 25FPS | 28FPS | GTX 1650 Super |
| Marathon | 25FPS | 28FPS | GTX 1650 Super |
| Gears of War: E-Day | 22FPS | 25FPS | GTX 1650 Super |
| Onimusha: Way of the Sword | 27FPS | 30FPS | GTX 1650 Super |
| Phantom Blade Zero | 25FPS | 28FPS | GTX 1650 Super |
| 007 First Light | 25FPS | 28FPS | GTX 1650 Super |
| The Blood of Dawnwalker | 21FPS | 24FPS | GTX 1650 Super |
| Pathologic 3 | 30FPS | 35FPS | GTX 1650 Super |
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super wins in 10 out of 10 games
We recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super as the best option for gaming.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions when comparing the RX 6500 XT with the GTX 1650 Super.
Which is better, the RX 6500 XT or the GTX 1650 Super?
On average at 1080p, the GTX 1650 Super is 12% faster than the RX 6500 XT. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.
Which is better at 4K?
At 4K Ultra, the RX 6500 XT averages 5 FPS and the GTX 1650 Super 7 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.
Is it worth paying more for the faster one?
At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.
Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?
AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.
How big is the FPS difference between them?
On average across top games, the gap is around 12% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.