NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 vs AMD Radeon RX 6700
Detailed gaming performance comparison
Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400
We compare the RTX 5050 and the RX 6700 with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.
The RTX 5050 is ~4% faster than the RX 6700 on average at 1080p. On top of that, the RTX 5050 is 25% cheaper (launch price).
RTX 5050
- Index (1080p)
- 48/100
- VRAM
- 8 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $249 · ≈ €229
- Upscaling
- DLSS + Frame Gen
Average FPS by resolution
Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.
| Resolution | RTX 5050 | RX 6700 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 50 | 48 | +4% |
| 1440p | 35 | 37 | +6% |
| 4K | 16 | 19 | +19% |
Specifications
Side-by-side specs of the RTX 5050 and RX 6700: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.
| Spec | RTX 5050 | RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | NVIDIA | AMD |
| VRAM | 8 GB | 10 GB |
| TDP | 130W | 220W |
| Tier | Entry-level | Mid-range |
| Score 1080p | 48 | 46 |
| Score 1440p | 38 | 40 |
| Score 4K | 22 | 27 |
| Price (MSRP) | $249 | $330 |
| Architecture | Blackwell | RDNA 2 |
| Process Node | TSMC 4N | TSMC 7nm |
| Shading Units (CUDA/Stream) | 2560 | 2304 |
| RT Cores | 20 | 36 |
| Texture Units (TMUs) | 80 | 144 |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 |
| Base Clock | 2310 MHz | 1755 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz | 2450 MHz |
| FP32 Performance | 13.17 TFLOPS | 11.29 TFLOPS |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Clock | 20000 MHz | 16000 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit | 160-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
| PCIe Version | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Transistor Count | 16.9B | 17.2B |
| Release Date | 2025-07-01 | 2022-03-24 |
Gaming Performance
Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.
| Game | RTX 5050 | RX 6700 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 56FPS | 54FPS | RTX 5050 |
 | 52FPS | 50FPS | RTX 5050 |
 | 41FPS | 39FPS | RTX 5050 |
 | 44FPS | 42FPS | RTX 5050 |
 | 45FPS | 43FPS | RTX 5050 |
| 43FPS | 41FPS | RTX 5050 | |
 | 54FPS | 51FPS | RTX 5050 |
 | 56FPS | 54FPS | RTX 5050 |
 | 62FPS | 59FPS | RTX 5050 |
 | 50FPS | 48FPS | RTX 5050 |
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 wins in 10 out of 10 games
We recommend NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 as the best option for gaming.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions when comparing the RTX 5050 with the RX 6700.
Which is better, the RTX 5050 or the RX 6700?
On average at 1080p, the RTX 5050 is 4% faster than the RX 6700. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.
Which is better at 4K?
At 4K Ultra, the RTX 5050 averages 16 FPS and the RX 6700 19 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.
Is it worth paying more for the faster one?
At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.
Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?
AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.
How big is the FPS difference between them?
On average across top games, the gap is around 4% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.
