CheckFPS
HomeFPS CalculatorGPUsCompare GPUsOptimize FPS

AMD Radeon R9 380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

Detailed gaming performance comparison

Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400

We compare the R9 380 and the GTX 1630 with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.

The R9 380 is ~36% faster than the GTX 1630 on average at 1080p. On top of that, the GTX 1630 is 25% cheaper (launch price).

R9 380

Index (1080p)
13/100
VRAM
4 GB
Price (MSRP)
$199 · ≈ €183
Upscaling
FSR

GTX 1630

Index (1080p)
10/100
VRAM
4 GB
Price (MSRP)
$150 · ≈ €138
Upscaling
FSR

Average FPS by resolution

Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.

ResolutionR9 380GTX 1630Difference
1080p1511+36%
1440p96+50%
4K55=

Specifications

Side-by-side specs of the R9 380 and GTX 1630: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.

SpecR9 380GTX 1630
BrandAMDNVIDIA
VRAM4 GB4 GB
TDP190W75W
TierEntry-levelEntry-level
Score 1080p1310
Score 1440p96
Score 4K42
Price (MSRP)$199$150

Gaming Performance

Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.

GameR9 380GTX 1630Winner
Grand Theft Auto IV: Complete Edition15FPS12FPSR9 380
Grand Theft Auto VI12FPS9FPSR9 380
Marvel 1943: Rise of Hydra15FPS11FPSR9 380
Marathon15FPS11FPSR9 380
Gears of War: E-Day13FPS10FPSR9 380
Onimusha: Way of the Sword16FPS12FPSR9 380
Phantom Blade Zero15FPS11FPSR9 380
007 First Light15FPS11FPSR9 380
The Blood of Dawnwalker13FPS10FPSR9 380
Pathologic 318FPS14FPSR9 380

Verdict

AMD Radeon R9 380 wins in 10 out of 10 games

We recommend AMD Radeon R9 380 as the best option for gaming.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions when comparing the R9 380 with the GTX 1630.

Which is better, the R9 380 or the GTX 1630?

On average at 1080p, the R9 380 is 36% faster than the GTX 1630. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.

Which is better at 4K?

At 4K Ultra, the R9 380 averages 5 FPS and the GTX 1630 5 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.

Is it worth paying more for the faster one?

At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.

Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?

AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.

How big is the FPS difference between them?

On average across top games, the gap is around 36% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.

Related Comparisons

R9 380 vs GTX 960R9 380 vs GTX 1050R9 380 vs RX 560GTX 1630 vs GTX 950GTX 1630 vs Intel Arc A310GTX 1630 vs Intel Arc A380

CheckFPS

CheckFPS was created by Lluis Enric Mayans, a PC hardware and graphics performance specialist. 200+ games, 135 GPUs, and real benchmark data to help you make better decisions.

200+ games · 135+ GPUs · 141+ CPUs

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Cookie Policy

Useful Links

  • Contact
  • About Us

Data sources & methodology

  • How we calculate FPS
🇪🇸Español🇬🇧English🇧🇷Português

© 2026 CheckFPS. All rights reserved.