NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64: real performance and FPS — which is better? Full comparison
Detailed gaming performance comparison
Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400
We compare the GTX 1650 Super and the RX Vega 64 with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.
The GTX 1650 Super and the RX Vega 64 perform almost identically; price and features make the difference.
GTX 1650 Super
- Index (1080p)
- 25/100
- VRAM
- 4 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $159 · ≈ €146
- $/FPS (value)
- $6.12 · ≈ €5.63
- Upscaling
- FSR
RX Vega 64
- Index (1080p)
- 25/100
- VRAM
- 8 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $499 · ≈ €459
- $/FPS (value)
- $19.19 · ≈ €17.66
- Upscaling
- FSR
Average FPS by resolution
Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.
| Resolution | GTX 1650 Super | RX Vega 64 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 26 | 26 | = |
| 1440p | 16 | 17 | +6% |
| 4K | 6 | 7 | +17% |
Which one for your resolution?
Tie
RX Vega 64 (+6%)
RX Vega 64 (+17%)
Specifications
Side-by-side specs of the GTX 1650 Super and RX Vega 64: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.
| Spec | GTX 1650 Super | RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | NVIDIA | AMD |
| VRAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| TDP | 100W | 295W |
| Tier | Entry-level | High-end |
| Score 1080p | 25 | 25 |
| Score 1440p | 18 | 19 |
| Score 4K | 9 | 10 |
| Price (MSRP) | $159 | $499 |
| Architecture | Turing | Vega |
| Process Node | TSMC 12nm | GlobalFoundries 14nm |
| Shading Units (CUDA/Stream) | 1280 | 4096 |
| RT Cores | — | — |
| Texture Units (TMUs) | 80 | 256 |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 |
| Base Clock | 1530 MHz | 1247 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1546 MHz |
| FP32 Performance (Teraflops) | 4.42 TFLOPS | 12.66 TFLOPS |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Clock | 12000 MHz | 945 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit | 2048-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 484 GB/s |
| PCIe Version | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Transistor Count | 6.6B | 12.5B |
| Release Date | 2019-11-22 | 2017-08-07 |
Power & efficiency
TDP doesn't tell the whole story: here's how much each GPU delivers per watt it draws.
GTX 1650 Super
- TDP
- 100W
- FPS/W
- 0.26
RX Vega 64
- TDP
- 295W
- FPS/W
- 0.09
The GTX 1650 Super is more efficient: it draws 195W less and delivers more per watt, though the GTX 1650 Super is still the faster card overall.
What FPS do these GPUs get in your game?
Pick the GPU and the game, and we'll take you straight to its real FPS.
Pick the GPU
Gaming Performance
Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.
| Game | GTX 1650 Super | RX Vega 64 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 29 | 29 | Tie |
 | 27 | 27 | Tie |
 | 21 | 21 | Tie |
 | 23 | 23 | Tie |
 | 23 | 23 | Tie |
| 22 | 22 | Tie | |
 | 28 | 28 | Tie |
 | 29 | 29 | Tie |
 | 32 | 32 | Tie |
 | 26 | 26 | Tie |
Verdict
It's a tie: both GPUs win in 0 out of 10 games
At CheckFPS we measured both cards across 10 popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K on a reference CPU. Performance is practically tied at every resolution, so the decision comes down to price and current availability.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions when comparing the GTX 1650 Super with the RX Vega 64.
Which is better, the GTX 1650 Super or the RX Vega 64?
On average at 1080p, the GTX 1650 Super is 0% faster than the RX Vega 64. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.
Which is better at 4K?
At 4K Ultra, the GTX 1650 Super averages 6 FPS and the RX Vega 64 7 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.
Is it worth paying more for the faster one?
At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.
Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?
AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.
How big is the FPS difference between them?
On average across top games, the gap is around 0% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.
1650 Super vs Vega 64: what's the real difference?
In performance, the GTX 1650 Super beats the RX Vega 64 by around 0% more FPS on average at 1080p — the gap shifts a bit by resolution, as shown in the table above. If you're torn between the 1650 Super and the Vega 64 on price, the price and $/FPS section above can help you decide.
