
How Many FPS Does Pathologic 3 Get with RX 6700 XT? Performance at 1080p, 1440p & 4K

Don't have Pathologic 3 yet?
Get it cheaper with an official key on Eneba.

Want the RX 6700 XT at the best price?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Pathologic 3 system requirements
Official minimum and recommended requirements published by the developer.
Minimum
Recommended
Upcoming games, cheaper with an official key.
Affiliate link
RX 6700 XT Specifications
These are the basic specs. The full RX 6700 XT page adds the rest of the technical data and its FPS game by game, not just in Pathologic 3.
Want the exact Pathologic 3 FPS with your RX 6700 XT?
These FPS assume a reference CPU. Add your real processor and RAM and we'll tailor the estimate to your rig.
- Estimate tailored to your rig
- Customize resolution, quality, and RAM
Pathologic 3 benchmark on RX 6700 XT: FPS by resolution and quality
Pick yours and we recalculate the whole table above with it.
Pathologic 3 FPS with a RX 6700 XT and a Intel Core i5-13400
| Quality | 1080p (Full HD) | 1440p (2K) | 4K (Ultra HD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultra | 68FPS min 54Good | 56FPS min 49Acceptable | 30FPS min 27Acceptable |
| High | 89FPS min 71Good | 72FPS min 63Good | 39FPS min 35Acceptable |
| Medium | 116FPS min 93Good | 95FPS min 83Good | 51FPS min 45Acceptable |
| Low | 151FPS min 121Excellent | 123FPS min 107Excellent | 66FPS min 58Good |
| Bottleneck (estimated) | CPU 12% | GPU 10% | GPU 52% |
The percentage estimates how much of the stronger component's capability goes unused because of the other one.
This one does matter: from the Intel Core i5-13400 downwards the processor becomes the brake on the RX 6700 XT. There is 24% between the slowest and fastest CPU in the table. One caveat: this is at 1080p, where the CPU weighs most. At 1440p and 4K the graphics card takes over and the processor stops mattering.
FSR performance: FPS with AI upscaling
Upscaling renders Pathologic 3 at a lower internal resolution and reconstructs the image, so you trade a little sharpness for extra frames. These are the estimated figures for the RX 6700 XT with FSR enabled, starting from its native Ultra FPS.
| Resolution | Native | FSR Quality | FSR Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 68 | 85 | 99 |
| 1440p | 56 | 76 | 92 |
| 4K | 30 | 44 | 56 |
About ray tracing: every figure on this page is with ray tracing off. The RX 6700 XT does have dedicated hardware for it, so you can turn it on in games that implement it. The FPS cost swings widely depending on how much ray tracing each title uses, and FSR is exactly what people lean on to pay for it.
Estimated figures. The real gain varies by game and by the version of the technology.
Is the CPU or the graphics card holding you back?
These FPS assume a mid-range CPU that isn't a bottleneck — roughly a Intel Core i5-13400 — and 16 GB of RAM.
With that CPU, the RX 6700 XT has headroom to spare in Pathologic 3: the processor runs out before the graphics card does. A faster processor would gain you FPS; a stronger graphics card would barely help. At 4K it flips: there the graphics card becomes the limit.
Is the RX 6700 XT Enough for Pathologic 3?
The RX 6700 XT delivers 68 FPS at 1080p Ultra in Pathologic 3. Enough for a smooth 60 FPS experience. For 144Hz, lower the quality to High.
At 1440p it gets 56 FPS and at 4K 30 FPS at Ultra quality.
Want more FPS in Pathologic 3?
Our guide collects the settings that give between +40% and +90% FPS in Pathologic 3 with barely any visual loss. Recommended settings, GPU-specific tips (NVIDIA/AMD/Intel) and solutions to common game issues.
RX 6700 XT or RTX 5060 Laptop for Pathologic 3?
In Pathologic 3 at 1080p Ultra, the RX 6700 XT gets 68 FPS and the RTX 5060 Laptop 70 FPS. The RTX 5060 Laptop is 3% ahead.
RX 6700 XT vs RTX 5060 Laptop: which one is faster?Other GPUs for Pathologic 3
If none of these convinces you for Pathologic 3, the full ranking sorts all 143 cards by real FPS, not synthetic scores.
See the full graphics card ranking by real FPS























