
How Many FPS Does Lords of the Fallen II Get with NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal)? Performance at 1080p, 1440p & 4K

Don't have Lords of the Fallen II yet?
Get it cheaper with an official key on Eneba.

Want the NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) at the best price?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Upcoming games, cheaper with an official key.
Affiliate link
NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) Specifications
These are the basic specs. The full NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) page adds the rest of the technical data and its FPS game by game, not just in Lords of the Fallen II.
Want the exact Lords of the Fallen II FPS with your NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal)?
These FPS assume a reference CPU. Add your real processor and RAM and we'll tailor the estimate to your rig.
- Estimate tailored to your rig
- Customize resolution, quality, and RAM
Lords of the Fallen II benchmark on NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal): FPS by resolution and quality
Pick yours and we recalculate the whole table above with it.
Lords of the Fallen II FPS with a NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) and a Intel Core i5-13400
| Quality | 1080p (Full HD) | 1440p (2K) | 4K (Ultra HD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultra | 35FPS min 31Acceptable | 26FPS min 23Poor | 13FPS min 12Unplayable |
| High | 45FPS min 40Acceptable | 34FPS min 30Acceptable | 17FPS min 15Poor |
| Medium | 59FPS min 52Acceptable | 45FPS min 40Acceptable | 22FPS min 20Poor |
| Low | 76FPS min 67Good | 58FPS min 51Acceptable | 28FPS min 25Poor |
| Bottleneck (estimated) | GPU 44% | GPU 58% | GPU 80% |
The percentage estimates how much of the stronger component's capability goes unused because of the other one.
Almost any modern CPU performs the same here: there is only 3% between the slowest and the fastest in the table. If you were wondering whether to upgrade your processor for Lords of the Fallen II, it is not worth it. One caveat: this is at 1080p, where the CPU weighs most. At 1440p and 4K the graphics card takes over and the processor stops mattering.
FSR performance: FPS with AI upscaling
Upscaling renders Lords of the Fallen II at a lower internal resolution and reconstructs the image, so you trade a little sharpness for extra frames. These are the estimated figures for the NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) with FSR enabled, starting from its native Ultra FPS.
| Resolution | Native | FSR Quality | FSR Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 35 | 44 | 51 |
| 1440p | 26 | 35 | 43 |
| 4K | 13 | 19 | 24 |
About ray tracing: every figure on this page is with ray tracing off. The NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) has no dedicated hardware for it, so it is an option best left disabled.
Estimated figures. The real gain varies by game and by the version of the technology.
Is the CPU or the graphics card holding you back?
These FPS assume a mid-range CPU that isn't a bottleneck — roughly a Intel Core i5-13400 — and 16 GB of RAM.
Here the graphics card is the brake: the NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) is what caps the frame rate in Lords of the Fallen II. A faster processor would hardly change the result.
Is the NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) Enough for Lords of the Fallen II?
The NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) delivers 35 FPS at 1080p Ultra in Lords of the Fallen II. Performance is acceptable but not ideal. Consider lowering the resolution or quality.
At 1440p it gets 26 FPS and at 4K 13 FPS at Ultra quality.
This GPU does not reach 60 FPS at 1080p Ultra
View recommended GPUs for Lords of the Fallen II→Want more FPS in Lords of the Fallen II?
Our guide collects the settings that give between +40% and +90% FPS in Lords of the Fallen II with barely any visual loss. Recommended settings, GPU-specific tips (NVIDIA/AMD/Intel) and solutions to common game issues.
NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) or RX 7700S for Lords of the Fallen II?
In Lords of the Fallen II at 1080p Ultra, the NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) gets 35 FPS and the RX 7700S 36 FPS. The RX 7700S is 3% ahead.
NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) vs RX 7700S: which one is faster?Other GPUs for Lords of the Fallen II
If none of these convinces you for Lords of the Fallen II, the full ranking sorts all 143 cards by real FPS, not synthetic scores.
See the full graphics card ranking by real FPS



















