
How Many FPS Does Lords of the Fallen II Get with Arc A310? Performance at 1080p, 1440p & 4K

Don't have Lords of the Fallen II yet?
Get it cheaper with an official key on Eneba.
Want the Arc A310 at the best price?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Upcoming games, cheaper with an official key.
Affiliate link
Arc A310 Specifications
These are the basic specs. The full Arc A310 page adds the rest of the technical data and its FPS game by game, not just in Lords of the Fallen II.
Want the exact Lords of the Fallen II FPS with your Arc A310?
These FPS assume a reference CPU. Add your real processor and RAM and we'll tailor the estimate to your rig.
- Estimate tailored to your rig
- Customize resolution, quality, and RAM
Lords of the Fallen II benchmark on Arc A310: FPS by resolution and quality
Pick yours and we recalculate the whole table above with it.
Lords of the Fallen II FPS with a Arc A310 and a Intel Core i5-13400
| Quality | 1080p (Full HD) | 1440p (2K) | 4K (Ultra HD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultra | 9FPS min 8Unplayable | 5FPS min 4Unplayable | 5FPS min 4Unplayable |
| High | 12FPS min 11Unplayable | 6FPS min 5Unplayable | 5FPS min 4Unplayable |
| Medium | 16FPS min 14Poor | 8FPS min 7Unplayable | 5FPS min 4Unplayable |
| Low | 21FPS min 19Poor | 11FPS min 10Unplayable | 5FPS min 4Unplayable |
| Bottleneck (estimated) | GPU 85% | GPU 92% | GPU 98% |
The percentage estimates how much of the stronger component's capability goes unused because of the other one.
It makes no difference which processor you have: with the Arc A310 in Lords of the Fallen II the graphics card is always the brake. Swapping CPU would not gain you a single frame — put the money into the card.
XeSS performance: FPS with AI upscaling
Upscaling renders Lords of the Fallen II at a lower internal resolution and reconstructs the image, so you trade a little sharpness for extra frames. These are the estimated figures for the Arc A310 with XeSS enabled, starting from its native Ultra FPS.
| Resolution | Native | XeSS Quality | XeSS Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 9 | 11 | 13 |
| 1440p | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| 4K | 5 | 7 | 9 |
About ray tracing: every figure on this page is with ray tracing off. The Arc A310 does have dedicated hardware for it, so you can turn it on in games that implement it. The FPS cost swings widely depending on how much ray tracing each title uses, and XeSS is exactly what people lean on to pay for it.
Estimated figures. The real gain varies by game and by the version of the technology.
Is the CPU or the graphics card holding you back?
These FPS assume a mid-range CPU that isn't a bottleneck — roughly a Intel Core i5-13400 — and 16 GB of RAM.
Here the graphics card is the brake: the Arc A310 is what caps the frame rate in Lords of the Fallen II. A faster processor would hardly change the result.
Is the Arc A310 Enough for Lords of the Fallen II?
The Arc A310 delivers 9 FPS at 1080p Ultra in Lords of the Fallen II. This GPU is not enough for Lords of the Fallen II at this resolution. We recommend a more powerful GPU.
At 1440p it gets 5 FPS and at 4K 5 FPS at Ultra quality.
This GPU does not reach 60 FPS at 1080p Ultra
View recommended GPUs for Lords of the Fallen II→Want more FPS in Lords of the Fallen II?
Our guide collects the settings that give between +40% and +90% FPS in Lords of the Fallen II with barely any visual loss. Recommended settings, GPU-specific tips (NVIDIA/AMD/Intel) and solutions to common game issues.
Arc A310 or RX 560 for Lords of the Fallen II?
In Lords of the Fallen II at 1080p Ultra, the Arc A310 gets 9 FPS and the RX 560 10 FPS. The RX 560 is 11% ahead.
Arc A310 vs RX 560: which one is faster?Other GPUs for Lords of the Fallen II
If none of these convinces you for Lords of the Fallen II, the full ranking sorts all 143 cards by real FPS, not synthetic scores.
See the full graphics card ranking by real FPS




















