
How Many FPS Does Control Resonant Get with RX 560? Performance at 1080p, 1440p & 4K

Don't have Control Resonant yet?
Get it cheaper with an official key on Eneba.

Want the RX 560 at the best price?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Upcoming games, cheaper with an official key.
Affiliate link
RX 560 Specifications
These are the basic specs. The full RX 560 page adds the rest of the technical data and its FPS game by game, not just in Control Resonant.
Want the exact Control Resonant FPS with your RX 560?
These FPS assume a reference CPU. Add your real processor and RAM and we'll tailor the estimate to your rig.
- Estimate tailored to your rig
- Customize resolution, quality, and RAM
Control Resonant benchmark on RX 560: FPS by resolution and quality
Pick yours and we recalculate the whole table above with it.
Control Resonant FPS with a RX 560 and a Intel Core i5-13400
| Quality | 1080p (Full HD) | 1440p (2K) | 4K (Ultra HD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultra | 9FPS min 8Unplayable | 5FPS min 4Unplayable | 5FPS min 4Unplayable |
| High | 12FPS min 11Unplayable | 7FPS min 6Unplayable | 5FPS min 4Unplayable |
| Medium | 16FPS min 14Poor | 9FPS min 8Unplayable | 5FPS min 4Unplayable |
| Low | 21FPS min 19Poor | 12FPS min 11Unplayable | 5FPS min 4Unplayable |
| Bottleneck (estimated) | GPU 85% | GPU 92% | GPU 97% |
The percentage estimates how much of the stronger component's capability goes unused because of the other one.
It makes no difference which processor you have: with the RX 560 in Control Resonant the graphics card is always the brake. Swapping CPU would not gain you a single frame — put the money into the card.
FSR performance: FPS with AI upscaling
Upscaling renders Control Resonant at a lower internal resolution and reconstructs the image, so you trade a little sharpness for extra frames. These are the estimated figures for the RX 560 with FSR enabled, starting from its native Ultra FPS.
| Resolution | Native | FSR Quality | FSR Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 9 | 11 | 13 |
| 1440p | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| 4K | 5 | 7 | 9 |
About ray tracing: every figure on this page is with ray tracing off. The RX 560 has no dedicated hardware for it, so it is an option best left disabled.
Estimated figures. The real gain varies by game and by the version of the technology.
Is the CPU or the graphics card holding you back?
These FPS assume a mid-range CPU that isn't a bottleneck — roughly a Intel Core i5-13400 — and 16 GB of RAM.
Here the graphics card is the brake: the RX 560 is what caps the frame rate in Control Resonant. A faster processor would hardly change the result.
Is the RX 560 Enough for Control Resonant?
The RX 560 delivers 9 FPS at 1080p Ultra in Control Resonant. This GPU is not enough for Control Resonant at this resolution. We recommend a more powerful GPU.
At 1440p it gets 5 FPS and at 4K 5 FPS at Ultra quality.
This GPU does not reach 60 FPS at 1080p Ultra
View recommended GPUs for Control Resonant→Want more FPS in Control Resonant?
Our guide collects the settings that give between +40% and +90% FPS in Control Resonant with barely any visual loss. Recommended settings, GPU-specific tips (NVIDIA/AMD/Intel) and solutions to common game issues.
RX 560 or GTX 960 for Control Resonant?
In Control Resonant at 1080p Ultra, the RX 560 gets 9 FPS and the GTX 960 10 FPS. The GTX 960 is 11% ahead.
RX 560 vs GTX 960: which one is faster?Other GPUs for Control Resonant
If none of these convinces you for Control Resonant, the full ranking sorts all 143 cards by real FPS, not synthetic scores.
See the full graphics card ranking by real FPS




















