AMD Radeon RX 590 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super: real performance and FPS — which is better? Full comparison
Detailed gaming performance comparison
Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400
We compare the RX 590 and the GTX 1650 Super with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.
The RX 590 is ~4% faster than the GTX 1650 Super on average at 1080p. On top of that, the GTX 1650 Super is 43% cheaper (launch price).
RX 590
- Index (1080p)
- 26/100
- VRAM
- 8 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $279 · ≈ €257
- $/FPS (value)
- $10.33 · ≈ €9.51
- Upscaling
- FSR
GTX 1650 Super
- Index (1080p)
- 25/100
- VRAM
- 4 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $159 · ≈ €146
- $/FPS (value)
- $6.12 · ≈ €5.63
- Upscaling
- FSR
Average FPS by resolution
Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.
| Resolution | RX 590 | GTX 1650 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 27 | 26 | +4% |
| 1440p | 17 | 16 | +6% |
| 4K | 7 | 6 | +17% |
Which one for your resolution?
RX 590 is the best pick at all three resolutions, averaging 9% more FPS.
Specifications
Side-by-side specs of the RX 590 and GTX 1650 Super: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.
| Spec | RX 590 | GTX 1650 Super |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | AMD | NVIDIA |
| VRAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| TDP | 225W | 100W |
| Tier | Mid-range | Entry-level |
| Score 1080p | 26 | 25 |
| Score 1440p | 19 | 18 |
| Score 4K | 10 | 9 |
| Price (MSRP) | $279 | $159 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | GlobalFoundries 12nm | TSMC 12nm |
| Shading Units (CUDA/Stream) | 2304 | 1280 |
| RT Cores | — | — |
| Texture Units (TMUs) | 144 | 80 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| Base Clock | 1469 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| FP32 Performance (Teraflops) | 7.12 TFLOPS | 4.42 TFLOPS |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Clock | 8000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 256-bit | 128-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
| PCIe Version | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Transistor Count | 5.7B | 6.6B |
| Release Date | 2018-11-15 | 2019-11-22 |
Power & efficiency
TDP doesn't tell the whole story: here's how much each GPU delivers per watt it draws.
RX 590
- TDP
- 225W
- FPS/W
- 0.12
GTX 1650 Super
- TDP
- 100W
- FPS/W
- 0.26
The GTX 1650 Super is more efficient: it draws 125W less and delivers more per watt, though the RX 590 is still the faster card overall.
What FPS do these GPUs get in your game?
Pick the GPU and the game, and we'll take you straight to its real FPS.
Pick the GPU
Gaming Performance
Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.
| Game | RX 590 | GTX 1650 Super | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 30 | 29 | RX 590 |
 | 28 | 27 | RX 590 |
 | 22 | 21 | RX 590 |
 | 24 | 23 | RX 590 |
 | 24 | 23 | RX 590 |
| 23 | 22 | RX 590 | |
 | 29 | 28 | RX 590 |
 | 30 | 29 | RX 590 |
 | 34 | 32 | RX 590 |
 | 27 | 26 | RX 590 |
Verdict
AMD Radeon RX 590 wins in 10 out of 10 games
At CheckFPS we measured both cards across 10 popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K on a reference CPU. The RX 590 comes out ahead by around 4% more FPS on average, and that lead holds up as resolution climbs. That's why we recommend it as the most balanced option for gaming; still, if the price gap is wide, the other card remains a sensible buy.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions when comparing the RX 590 with the GTX 1650 Super.
Which is better, the RX 590 or the GTX 1650 Super?
On average at 1080p, the RX 590 is 4% faster than the GTX 1650 Super. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.
Which is better at 4K?
At 4K Ultra, the RX 590 averages 7 FPS and the GTX 1650 Super 6 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.
Is it worth paying more for the faster one?
At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.
Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?
AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.
How big is the FPS difference between them?
On average across top games, the gap is around 4% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.
590 vs 1650 Super: what's the real difference?
In performance, the RX 590 beats the GTX 1650 Super by around 4% more FPS on average at 1080p — the gap shifts a bit by resolution, as shown in the table above. If you're torn between the 590 and the 1650 Super on price, the price and $/FPS section above can help you decide.
