NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Detailed gaming performance comparison
Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400
We compare the RTX 5060 Ti and the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.
The RTX 5060 Ti is ~16% faster than the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB on average at 1080p. On top of that, the RTX 5060 Ti is 14% cheaper (launch price).
RTX 5060 Ti
- Index (1080p)
- 68/100
- VRAM
- 16 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $429 · ≈ €395
- Upscaling
- DLSS + Frame Gen
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
- Index (1080p)
- 60/100
- VRAM
- 16 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $499 · ≈ €459
- Upscaling
- DLSS + Frame Gen
Average FPS by resolution
Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.
| Resolution | RTX 5060 Ti | RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 72 | 62 | +16% |
| 1440p | 57 | 48 | +19% |
| 4K | 34 | 26 | +31% |
Specifications
Side-by-side specs of the RTX 5060 Ti and RTX 4060 Ti 16GB: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.
| Spec | RTX 5060 Ti | RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| VRAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| TDP | 180W | 165W |
| Tier | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Score 1080p | 68 | 60 |
| Score 1440p | 63 | 53 |
| Score 4K | 48 | 37 |
| Price (MSRP) | $429 | $499 |
| Architecture | Blackwell | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | TSMC 4N | TSMC 4nm (4N) |
| Shading Units (CUDA/Stream) | 4608 | 4352 |
| RT Cores | 36 | 34 |
| Texture Units (TMUs) | 144 | 136 |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| Base Clock | 2407 MHz | 2310 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz | 2535 MHz |
| FP32 Performance | 23.7 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Clock | 28000 MHz | 18000 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| PCIe Version | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Transistor Count | 21.9B | 22.9B |
| Release Date | 2025-04-16 | 2023-07-18 |
Gaming Performance
Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.
| Game | RTX 5060 Ti | RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 82FPS | 68FPS | RTX 5060 Ti |
 | 72FPS | 64FPS | RTX 5060 Ti |
 | 58FPS | 51FPS | RTX 5060 Ti |
 | 62FPS | 55FPS | RTX 5060 Ti |
 | 64FPS | 56FPS | RTX 5060 Ti |
| 61FPS | 54FPS | RTX 5060 Ti | |
 | 77FPS | 66FPS | RTX 5060 Ti |
 | 82FPS | 68FPS | RTX 5060 Ti |
 | 90FPS | 76FPS | RTX 5060 Ti |
 | 69FPS | 62FPS | RTX 5060 Ti |
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti wins in 10 out of 10 games
We recommend NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti as the best option for gaming.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions when comparing the RTX 5060 Ti with the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB.
Which is better, the RTX 5060 Ti or the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?
On average at 1080p, the RTX 5060 Ti is 16% faster than the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.
Which is better at 4K?
At 4K Ultra, the RTX 5060 Ti averages 34 FPS and the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB 26 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.
Is it worth paying more for the faster one?
At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.
Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?
AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.
How big is the FPS difference between them?
On average across top games, the gap is around 16% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.
