Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp: real performance and FPS — which is better? Full comparison
Detailed gaming performance comparison
Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400
We compare the Intel Arc A770 and the NVIDIA TITAN Xp with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.
The Intel Arc A770 is ~10% faster than the NVIDIA TITAN Xp on average at 1080p. On top of that, the Intel Arc A770 is 73% cheaper (launch price).
Intel Arc A770
- Index (1080p)
- 44/100
- VRAM
- 16 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $329 · ≈ €303
- $/FPS (value)
- $7.15 · ≈ €6.58
- Upscaling
- XeSS
NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- Index (1080p)
- 40/100
- VRAM
- 12 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $1199 · ≈ €1103
- $/FPS (value)
- $28.55 · ≈ €26.26
- Upscaling
- FSR
Average FPS by resolution
Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.
| Resolution | Intel Arc A770 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 46 | 42 | +10% |
| 1440p | 35 | 32 | +9% |
| 4K | 18 | 16 | +13% |
Which one for your resolution?
Intel Arc A770 is the best pick at all three resolutions, averaging 11% more FPS.
Specifications
Side-by-side specs of the Intel Arc A770 and NVIDIA TITAN Xp: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.
| Spec | Intel Arc A770 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Intel | NVIDIA |
| VRAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| TDP | 225W | 250W |
| Tier | Mid-range | Enthusiast |
| Score 1080p | 44 | 40 |
| Score 1440p | 38 | 35 |
| Score 4K | 25 | 23 |
| Price (MSRP) | $329 | $1199 |
| Architecture | Alchemist | Pascal |
| Process Node | TSMC 6nm | TSMC 16nm |
| Shading Units (CUDA/Stream) | 4096 | 3840 |
| RT Cores | 32 | — |
| Texture Units (TMUs) | 256 | 240 |
| ROPs | 128 | 96 |
| Base Clock | 2100 MHz | 1405 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| FP32 Performance (Teraflops) | 19.66 TFLOPS | 12.15 TFLOPS |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Clock | 17500 MHz | 11400 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 256-bit | 384-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 560 GB/s | 547.7 GB/s |
| PCIe Version | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Transistor Count | 21.7B | 12.0B |
| Release Date | 2022-10-12 | 2017-04-06 |
Power & efficiency
TDP doesn't tell the whole story: here's how much each GPU delivers per watt it draws.
Intel Arc A770
- TDP
- 225W
- FPS/W
- 0.20
NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- TDP
- 250W
- FPS/W
- 0.17
The Intel Arc A770 is more efficient: it draws 25W less and delivers more per watt, though the Intel Arc A770 is still the faster card overall.
What FPS do these GPUs get in your game?
Pick the GPU and the game, and we'll take you straight to its real FPS.
Pick the GPU
Gaming Performance
Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.
| Game | Intel Arc A770 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 51 | 47 | Intel Arc A770 |
 | 47 | 43 | Intel Arc A770 |
 | 38 | 34 | Intel Arc A770 |
 | 40 | 36 | Intel Arc A770 |
 | 41 | 38 | Intel Arc A770 |
| 39 | 36 | Intel Arc A770 | |
 | 49 | 45 | Intel Arc A770 |
 | 51 | 47 | Intel Arc A770 |
 | 57 | 52 | Intel Arc A770 |
 | 46 | 42 | Intel Arc A770 |
Verdict
Intel Arc A770 wins in 10 out of 10 games
At CheckFPS we measured both cards across 10 popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K on a reference CPU. The Intel Arc A770 comes out ahead by around 10% more FPS on average, and that lead holds up as resolution climbs. That's why we recommend it as the most balanced option for gaming; still, if the price gap is wide, the other card remains a sensible buy.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions when comparing the Intel Arc A770 with the NVIDIA TITAN Xp.
Which is better, the Intel Arc A770 or the NVIDIA TITAN Xp?
On average at 1080p, the Intel Arc A770 is 10% faster than the NVIDIA TITAN Xp. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.
Which is better at 4K?
At 4K Ultra, the Intel Arc A770 averages 18 FPS and the NVIDIA TITAN Xp 16 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.
Is it worth paying more for the faster one?
At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.
Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?
AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.
How big is the FPS difference between them?
On average across top games, the gap is around 10% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.
Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp: what's the real difference?
In performance, the Intel Arc A770 beats the NVIDIA TITAN Xp by around 10% more FPS on average at 1080p — the gap shifts a bit by resolution, as shown in the table above. If you're torn between the Intel Arc A770 and the NVIDIA TITAN Xp on price, the price and $/FPS section above can help you decide.
