Intel Arc A750 vs Intel Arc A770
Detailed gaming performance comparison
Reference CPU: Intel Core i5-13400
We compare the Intel Arc A750 and the Intel Arc A770 with real FPS across the most popular games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, plus specs, launch price and AI upscaling support (DLSS/FSR/XeSS). See at a glance which is better for your resolution and budget.
The Intel Arc A770 is ~9% faster than the Intel Arc A750 on average at 1080p. On top of that, the Intel Arc A750 is 12% cheaper (launch price).
Intel Arc A750
- Index (1080p)
- 40/100
- VRAM
- 8 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $289 · ≈ €266
- Upscaling
- XeSS
Intel Arc A770
- Index (1080p)
- 44/100
- VRAM
- 16 GB
- Price (MSRP)
- $329 · ≈ €303
- Upscaling
- XeSS
Average FPS by resolution
Estimated average FPS for each graphics card across the most popular games. The gap usually shows at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K both lose smoothness and upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps.
| Resolution | Intel Arc A750 | Intel Arc A770 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 46 | 50 | +9% |
| 1440p | 34 | 38 | +12% |
| 4K | 16 | 19 | +19% |
Specifications
Side-by-side specs of the Intel Arc A750 and Intel Arc A770: VRAM, power draw (TDP), performance index and launch price. The better value in each row is highlighted in blue.
| Spec | Intel Arc A750 | Intel Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| VRAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| TDP | 225W | 225W |
| Tier | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Score 1080p | 40 | 44 |
| Score 1440p | 34 | 38 |
| Score 4K | 21 | 25 |
| Price (MSRP) | $289 | $329 |
Gaming Performance
Per-game FPS detail at 1080p Ultra. The graphics card that wins each title is highlighted in blue.
| Game | Intel Arc A750 | Intel Arc A770 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grand Theft Auto IV: Complete Edition | 47FPS | 51FPS | Intel Arc A770 |
| Grand Theft Auto VI | 36FPS | 39FPS | Intel Arc A770 |
| Halloween: The Game | 45FPS | 49FPS | Intel Arc A770 |
| Kena: Scars of Kosmora | 47FPS | 51FPS | Intel Arc A770 |
| Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War IV | 52FPS | 57FPS | Intel Arc A770 |
| Mortal Shell II | 42FPS | 46FPS | Intel Arc A770 |
| Clive Barker's Hellraiser: Revival | 45FPS | 49FPS | Intel Arc A770 |
| Valor Mortis | 42FPS | 46FPS | Intel Arc A770 |
| Star Wars Zero Company | 52FPS | 57FPS | Intel Arc A770 |
| Ace Combat 8: Wings of Theve | 47FPS | 51FPS | Intel Arc A770 |
Verdict
Intel Arc A770 wins in 10 out of 10 games
We recommend Intel Arc A770 as the best option for gaming.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions when comparing the Intel Arc A750 with the Intel Arc A770.
Which is better, the Intel Arc A750 or the Intel Arc A770?
On average at 1080p, the Intel Arc A770 is 9% faster than the Intel Arc A750. The best one for you depends on your resolution, budget and whether you prioritise ray tracing or price.
Which is better at 4K?
At 4K Ultra, the Intel Arc A750 averages 16 FPS and the Intel Arc A770 19 FPS across the most popular games. For smooth 4K, enabling upscaling (DLSS/FSR) helps on both.
Is it worth paying more for the faster one?
At 1080p or 1440p the FPS gap may not justify the extra cost; at 4K or with ray tracing the faster card matters more. Check the by-resolution table to decide.
Which has better ray tracing and upscaling?
AI upscaling (DLSS on NVIDIA, FSR on AMD, XeSS on Intel) raises FPS on both; for ray tracing, GeForce RTX cards usually lead. See each card’s support above.
How big is the FPS difference between them?
On average across top games, the gap is around 9% at 1080p. At higher resolutions (1440p and 4K) the relative difference usually stays similar.