
How Many FPS Does Starfield Get with RX 6600M? Performance at 1080p, 1440p & 4K

Don't have Starfield yet?
Get it cheaper with an official key on Eneba.

Want the RX 6600M at the best price?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Starfield system requirements
Official minimum and recommended requirements published by the developer.
Minimum
Recommended
Upcoming games, cheaper with an official key.
Affiliate link
RX 6600M Specifications
These are the basic specs. The full RX 6600M page adds the rest of the technical data and its FPS game by game, not just in Starfield.
Want the exact Starfield FPS with your RX 6600M?
These FPS assume a reference CPU. Add your real processor and RAM and we'll tailor the estimate to your rig.
- Estimate tailored to your rig
- Customize resolution, quality, and RAM
Starfield benchmark on RX 6600M: FPS by resolution and quality
Pick yours and we recalculate the whole table above with it.
Starfield FPS with a RX 6600M and a Intel Core i5-13400
| Quality | 1080p (Full HD) | 1440p (2K) | 4K (Ultra HD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultra | 34FPS min 30Acceptable | 22FPS min 20Poor | 9FPS min 8Unplayable |
| High | 44FPS min 39Acceptable | 29FPS min 26Poor | 12FPS min 11Unplayable |
| Medium | 58FPS min 51Acceptable | 38FPS min 34Acceptable | 16FPS min 14Poor |
| Low | 74FPS min 65Good | 49FPS min 44Acceptable | 21FPS min 19Poor |
| Bottleneck (estimated) | GPU 46% | GPU 64% | GPU 85% |
The percentage estimates how much of the stronger component's capability goes unused because of the other one.
Almost any modern CPU performs the same here: there is only 0% between the slowest and the fastest in the table. If you were wondering whether to upgrade your processor for Starfield, it is not worth it. One caveat: this is at 1080p, where the CPU weighs most. At 1440p and 4K the graphics card takes over and the processor stops mattering.
FSR performance: FPS with AI upscaling
Upscaling renders Starfield at a lower internal resolution and reconstructs the image, so you trade a little sharpness for extra frames. These are the estimated figures for the RX 6600M with FSR enabled, starting from its native Ultra FPS.
| Resolution | Native | FSR Quality | FSR Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 34 | 43 | 49 |
| 1440p | 22 | 30 | 36 |
| 4K | 9 | 13 | 17 |
About ray tracing: every figure on this page is with ray tracing off. The RX 6600M does have dedicated hardware for it, so you can turn it on in games that implement it. The FPS cost swings widely depending on how much ray tracing each title uses, and FSR is exactly what people lean on to pay for it.
Estimated figures. The real gain varies by game and by the version of the technology.
Is the CPU or the graphics card holding you back?
These FPS assume a mid-range CPU that isn't a bottleneck — roughly a Intel Core i5-13400 — and 16 GB of RAM.
Here the graphics card is the brake: the RX 6600M is what caps the frame rate in Starfield. A faster processor would hardly change the result.
Is the RX 6600M Enough for Starfield?
The RX 6600M delivers 34 FPS at 1080p Ultra in Starfield. Performance is acceptable but not ideal. Consider lowering the resolution or quality.
At 1440p it gets 22 FPS and at 4K 9 FPS at Ultra quality.
This GPU does not reach 60 FPS at 1080p Ultra
View recommended GPUs for Starfield→Want more FPS in Starfield?
Our guide collects the settings that give between +40% and +90% FPS in Starfield with barely any visual loss. Recommended settings, GPU-specific tips (NVIDIA/AMD/Intel) and solutions to common game issues.
RX 6600M or GTX 1660 Ti for Starfield?
In Starfield at 1080p Ultra both land on the same figure: 34 FPS. Price and power draw are what separate them.
RX 6600M vs GTX 1660 Ti: which one is faster?Other GPUs for Starfield
If none of these convinces you for Starfield, the full ranking sorts all 143 cards by real FPS, not synthetic scores.
See the full graphics card ranking by real FPS




















