
How Many FPS Does Lords of the Fallen II Get with RX 6800? Performance at 1080p, 1440p & 4K

Don't have Lords of the Fallen II yet?
Get it cheaper with an official key on Eneba.

Want the RX 6800 at the best price?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Upcoming games, cheaper with an official key.
Affiliate link
RX 6800 Specifications
These are the basic specs. The full RX 6800 page adds the rest of the technical data and its FPS game by game, not just in Lords of the Fallen II.
Want the exact Lords of the Fallen II FPS with your RX 6800?
These FPS assume a reference CPU. Add your real processor and RAM and we'll tailor the estimate to your rig.
- Estimate tailored to your rig
- Customize resolution, quality, and RAM
Lords of the Fallen II benchmark on RX 6800: FPS by resolution and quality
Pick yours and we recalculate the whole table above with it.
Lords of the Fallen II FPS with a RX 6800 and a Intel Core i5-13400
| Quality | 1080p (Full HD) | 1440p (2K) | 4K (Ultra HD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultra | 57FPS min 50Acceptable | 47FPS min 41Acceptable | 28FPS min 25Poor |
| High | 74FPS min 64Good | 61FPS min 54Good | 37FPS min 33Acceptable |
| Medium | 97FPS min 84Good | 80FPS min 70Good | 48FPS min 43Acceptable |
| Low | 126FPS min 110Excellent | 104FPS min 91Good | 62FPS min 55Good |
| Bottleneck (estimated) | balanced | GPU 25% | GPU 55% |
The percentage estimates how much of the stronger component's capability goes unused because of the other one.
This one does matter: from the Intel Core i5-10400F downwards the processor becomes the brake on the RX 6800. There is 12% between the slowest and fastest CPU in the table. One caveat: this is at 1080p, where the CPU weighs most. At 1440p and 4K the graphics card takes over and the processor stops mattering.
FSR performance: FPS with AI upscaling
Upscaling renders Lords of the Fallen II at a lower internal resolution and reconstructs the image, so you trade a little sharpness for extra frames. These are the estimated figures for the RX 6800 with FSR enabled, starting from its native Ultra FPS.
| Resolution | Native | FSR Quality | FSR Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 57 | 71 | 83 |
| 1440p | 47 | 63 | 78 |
| 4K | 28 | 41 | 52 |
About ray tracing: every figure on this page is with ray tracing off. The RX 6800 does have dedicated hardware for it, so you can turn it on in games that implement it. The FPS cost swings widely depending on how much ray tracing each title uses, and FSR is exactly what people lean on to pay for it.
Estimated figures. The real gain varies by game and by the version of the technology.
Is the CPU or the graphics card holding you back?
These FPS assume a mid-range CPU that isn't a bottleneck — roughly a Intel Core i5-13400 — and 16 GB of RAM.
The RX 6800 and that processor are well matched in Lords of the Fallen II: neither clearly holds the other back, so the table figures are a fair reflection of the pair. At 4K it flips: there the graphics card becomes the limit.
Is the RX 6800 Enough for Lords of the Fallen II?
The RX 6800 delivers 57 FPS at 1080p Ultra in Lords of the Fallen II. Performance is acceptable but not ideal. Consider lowering the resolution or quality.
At 1440p it gets 47 FPS and at 4K 28 FPS at Ultra quality.
This GPU does not reach 60 FPS at 1080p Ultra
View recommended GPUs for Lords of the Fallen II→Want more FPS in Lords of the Fallen II?
Our guide collects the settings that give between +40% and +90% FPS in Lords of the Fallen II with barely any visual loss. Recommended settings, GPU-specific tips (NVIDIA/AMD/Intel) and solutions to common game issues.
RX 6800 or RX 9060 XT 8GB for Lords of the Fallen II?
In Lords of the Fallen II at 1080p Ultra, the RX 6800 gets 57 FPS and the RX 9060 XT 8GB 58 FPS. The RX 9060 XT 8GB is 2% ahead.
RX 6800 vs RX 9060 XT 8GB: which one is faster?Other GPUs for Lords of the Fallen II
If none of these convinces you for Lords of the Fallen II, the full ranking sorts all 143 cards by real FPS, not synthetic scores.
See the full graphics card ranking by real FPS























