
How Many FPS Does Lords of the Fallen II Get with RX 6600M? Performance at 1080p, 1440p & 4K

Don't have Lords of the Fallen II yet?
Get it cheaper with an official key on Eneba.

Want the RX 6600M at the best price?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Upcoming games, cheaper with an official key.
Affiliate link
RX 6600M Specifications
These are the basic specs. The full RX 6600M page adds the rest of the technical data and its FPS game by game, not just in Lords of the Fallen II.
Want the exact Lords of the Fallen II FPS with your RX 6600M?
These FPS assume a reference CPU. Add your real processor and RAM and we'll tailor the estimate to your rig.
- Estimate tailored to your rig
- Customize resolution, quality, and RAM
Lords of the Fallen II benchmark on RX 6600M: FPS by resolution and quality
Pick yours and we recalculate the whole table above with it.
Lords of the Fallen II FPS with a RX 6600M and a Intel Core i5-13400
| Quality | 1080p (Full HD) | 1440p (2K) | 4K (Ultra HD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultra | 30FPS min 27Acceptable | 20FPS min 18Poor | 8FPS min 7Unplayable |
| High | 39FPS min 35Acceptable | 26FPS min 23Poor | 11FPS min 10Unplayable |
| Medium | 51FPS min 45Acceptable | 34FPS min 30Acceptable | 14FPS min 13Unplayable |
| Low | 66FPS min 58Good | 44FPS min 39Acceptable | 18FPS min 16Poor |
| Bottleneck (estimated) | GPU 52% | GPU 68% | GPU 87% |
The percentage estimates how much of the stronger component's capability goes unused because of the other one.
Almost any modern CPU performs the same here: there is only 0% between the slowest and the fastest in the table. If you were wondering whether to upgrade your processor for Lords of the Fallen II, it is not worth it. One caveat: this is at 1080p, where the CPU weighs most. At 1440p and 4K the graphics card takes over and the processor stops mattering.
FSR performance: FPS with AI upscaling
Upscaling renders Lords of the Fallen II at a lower internal resolution and reconstructs the image, so you trade a little sharpness for extra frames. These are the estimated figures for the RX 6600M with FSR enabled, starting from its native Ultra FPS.
| Resolution | Native | FSR Quality | FSR Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 30 | 38 | 44 |
| 1440p | 20 | 27 | 33 |
| 4K | 8 | 12 | 15 |
About ray tracing: every figure on this page is with ray tracing off. The RX 6600M does have dedicated hardware for it, so you can turn it on in games that implement it. The FPS cost swings widely depending on how much ray tracing each title uses, and FSR is exactly what people lean on to pay for it.
Estimated figures. The real gain varies by game and by the version of the technology.
Is the CPU or the graphics card holding you back?
These FPS assume a mid-range CPU that isn't a bottleneck — roughly a Intel Core i5-13400 — and 16 GB of RAM.
Here the graphics card is the brake: the RX 6600M is what caps the frame rate in Lords of the Fallen II. A faster processor would hardly change the result.
Is the RX 6600M Enough for Lords of the Fallen II?
The RX 6600M delivers 30 FPS at 1080p Ultra in Lords of the Fallen II. Performance is acceptable but not ideal. Consider lowering the resolution or quality.
At 1440p it gets 20 FPS and at 4K 8 FPS at Ultra quality.
This GPU does not reach 60 FPS at 1080p Ultra
View recommended GPUs for Lords of the Fallen II→Want more FPS in Lords of the Fallen II?
Our guide collects the settings that give between +40% and +90% FPS in Lords of the Fallen II with barely any visual loss. Recommended settings, GPU-specific tips (NVIDIA/AMD/Intel) and solutions to common game issues.
RX 6600M or GTX 1660 Ti for Lords of the Fallen II?
In Lords of the Fallen II at 1080p Ultra both land on the same figure: 30 FPS. Price and power draw are what separate them.
RX 6600M vs GTX 1660 Ti: which one is faster?Other GPUs for Lords of the Fallen II
If none of these convinces you for Lords of the Fallen II, the full ranking sorts all 143 cards by real FPS, not synthetic scores.
See the full graphics card ranking by real FPS




















