
How Many FPS Does Lords of the Fallen II Get with Arc A770? Performance at 1080p, 1440p & 4K

Don't have Lords of the Fallen II yet?
Get it cheaper with an official key on Eneba.

Want the Arc A770 at the best price?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Upcoming games, cheaper with an official key.
Affiliate link
Arc A770 Specifications
These are the basic specs. The full Arc A770 page adds the rest of the technical data and its FPS game by game, not just in Lords of the Fallen II.
Want the exact Lords of the Fallen II FPS with your Arc A770?
These FPS assume a reference CPU. Add your real processor and RAM and we'll tailor the estimate to your rig.
- Estimate tailored to your rig
- Customize resolution, quality, and RAM
Lords of the Fallen II benchmark on Arc A770: FPS by resolution and quality
Pick yours and we recalculate the whole table above with it.
Lords of the Fallen II FPS with a Arc A770 and a Intel Core i5-13400
| Quality | 1080p (Full HD) | 1440p (2K) | 4K (Ultra HD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultra | 41FPS min 36Acceptable | 31FPS min 27Acceptable | 16FPS min 14Poor |
| High | 54FPS min 48Acceptable | 41FPS min 36Acceptable | 21FPS min 19Poor |
| Medium | 70FPS min 62Good | 53FPS min 47Acceptable | 27FPS min 24Poor |
| Low | 91FPS min 80Good | 69FPS min 61Good | 35FPS min 31Acceptable |
| Bottleneck (estimated) | GPU 34% | GPU 50% | GPU 74% |
The percentage estimates how much of the stronger component's capability goes unused because of the other one.
This one does matter: from the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 downwards the processor becomes the brake on the Arc A770. There is 5% between the slowest and fastest CPU in the table. One caveat: this is at 1080p, where the CPU weighs most. At 1440p and 4K the graphics card takes over and the processor stops mattering.
XeSS performance: FPS with AI upscaling
Upscaling renders Lords of the Fallen II at a lower internal resolution and reconstructs the image, so you trade a little sharpness for extra frames. These are the estimated figures for the Arc A770 with XeSS enabled, starting from its native Ultra FPS.
| Resolution | Native | XeSS Quality | XeSS Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 41 | 51 | 59 |
| 1440p | 31 | 42 | 51 |
| 4K | 16 | 23 | 30 |
About ray tracing: every figure on this page is with ray tracing off. The Arc A770 does have dedicated hardware for it, so you can turn it on in games that implement it. The FPS cost swings widely depending on how much ray tracing each title uses, and XeSS is exactly what people lean on to pay for it.
Estimated figures. The real gain varies by game and by the version of the technology.
Is the CPU or the graphics card holding you back?
These FPS assume a mid-range CPU that isn't a bottleneck — roughly a Intel Core i5-13400 — and 16 GB of RAM.
Here the graphics card is the brake: the Arc A770 is what caps the frame rate in Lords of the Fallen II. A faster processor would hardly change the result.
Is the Arc A770 Enough for Lords of the Fallen II?
The Arc A770 delivers 41 FPS at 1080p Ultra in Lords of the Fallen II. Performance is acceptable but not ideal. Consider lowering the resolution or quality.
At 1440p it gets 31 FPS and at 4K 16 FPS at Ultra quality.
This GPU does not reach 60 FPS at 1080p Ultra
View recommended GPUs for Lords of the Fallen II→Want more FPS in Lords of the Fallen II?
Our guide collects the settings that give between +40% and +90% FPS in Lords of the Fallen II with barely any visual loss. Recommended settings, GPU-specific tips (NVIDIA/AMD/Intel) and solutions to common game issues.
Arc A770 or RTX 3060 for Lords of the Fallen II?
In Lords of the Fallen II at 1080p Ultra, the Arc A770 gets 41 FPS and the RTX 3060 42 FPS. The RTX 3060 is 2% ahead.
Arc A770 vs RTX 3060: which one is faster?Other GPUs for Lords of the Fallen II
If none of these convinces you for Lords of the Fallen II, the full ranking sorts all 143 cards by real FPS, not synthetic scores.
See the full graphics card ranking by real FPS





















