
How Many FPS Does Control Resonant Get with RX 6950 XT? Performance at 1080p, 1440p & 4K

Don't have Control Resonant yet?
Get it cheaper with an official key on Eneba.

Want the RX 6950 XT at the best price?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Upcoming games, cheaper with an official key.
Affiliate link
RX 6950 XT Specifications
These are the basic specs. The full RX 6950 XT page adds the rest of the technical data and its FPS game by game, not just in Control Resonant.
Want the exact Control Resonant FPS with your RX 6950 XT?
These FPS assume a reference CPU. Add your real processor and RAM and we'll tailor the estimate to your rig.
- Estimate tailored to your rig
- Customize resolution, quality, and RAM
Control Resonant benchmark on RX 6950 XT: FPS by resolution and quality
Pick yours and we recalculate the whole table above with it.
Control Resonant FPS with a RX 6950 XT and a Intel Core i5-13400
| Quality | 1080p (Full HD) | 1440p (2K) | 4K (Ultra HD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultra | 64FPS min 56Good | 54FPS min 47Acceptable | 35FPS min 31Acceptable |
| High | 83FPS min 72Good | 70FPS min 61Good | 45FPS min 40Acceptable |
| Medium | 109FPS min 95Good | 92FPS min 80Good | 59FPS min 52Acceptable |
| Low | 140FPS min 122Excellent | 119FPS min 104Good | 77FPS min 68Good |
| Bottleneck (estimated) | balanced | GPU 13% | GPU 44% |
The percentage estimates how much of the stronger component's capability goes unused because of the other one.
This one does matter: from the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 downwards the processor becomes the brake on the RX 6950 XT. There is 10% between the slowest and fastest CPU in the table. One caveat: this is at 1080p, where the CPU weighs most. At 1440p and 4K the graphics card takes over and the processor stops mattering.
FSR performance: FPS with AI upscaling
Upscaling renders Control Resonant at a lower internal resolution and reconstructs the image, so you trade a little sharpness for extra frames. These are the estimated figures for the RX 6950 XT with FSR enabled, starting from its native Ultra FPS.
| Resolution | Native | FSR Quality | FSR Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 64 | 80 | 93 |
| 1440p | 54 | 73 | 89 |
| 4K | 35 | 51 | 65 |
About ray tracing: every figure on this page is with ray tracing off. The RX 6950 XT does have dedicated hardware for it, so you can turn it on in games that implement it. The FPS cost swings widely depending on how much ray tracing each title uses, and FSR is exactly what people lean on to pay for it.
Estimated figures. The real gain varies by game and by the version of the technology.
Is the CPU or the graphics card holding you back?
These FPS assume a mid-range CPU that isn't a bottleneck — roughly a Intel Core i5-13400 — and 16 GB of RAM.
The RX 6950 XT and that processor are well matched in Control Resonant: neither clearly holds the other back, so the table figures are a fair reflection of the pair. At 4K it flips: there the graphics card becomes the limit.
Is the RX 6950 XT Enough for Control Resonant?
The RX 6950 XT delivers 64 FPS at 1080p Ultra in Control Resonant. Enough for a smooth 60 FPS experience. For 144Hz, lower the quality to High.
At 1440p it gets 54 FPS and at 4K 35 FPS at Ultra quality.
Want more FPS in Control Resonant?
Our guide collects the settings that give between +40% and +90% FPS in Control Resonant with barely any visual loss. Recommended settings, GPU-specific tips (NVIDIA/AMD/Intel) and solutions to common game issues.
RX 6950 XT or RTX 3090 for Control Resonant?
In Control Resonant at 1080p Ultra both land on the same figure: 64 FPS. Price and power draw are what separate them.
RX 6950 XT vs RTX 3090: which one is faster?Other GPUs for Control Resonant
If none of these convinces you for Control Resonant, the full ranking sorts all 143 cards by real FPS, not synthetic scores.
See the full graphics card ranking by real FPS





















